Nanoco Group PLC (NANON)

18.80
-0.52(-2.82%)
  • Volume:
    75,807
  • Bid/Ask:
    18.80/19.00
  • Day's Range:
    18.10 - 18.10

NANON Overview

Prev. Close
18.63
Day's Range
18.1-18.1
Revenue
2M
Open
18.1
52 wk Range
8.2-30.9
EPS
-0.02
Volume
75,807
Market Cap
56.93M
Dividend (Yield)
N/A
(N/A)
Average Volume (3m)
453,703
P/E Ratio
-
Beta
0.78
1-Year Change
12.58%
Shares Outstanding
305,686,880
Next Earnings Date
10 Oct 2021
What is your sentiment on Nanoco Group PLC?
or
Vote to see community's results!

Nanoco Group PLC News

Nanoco Group PLC Analysis

Technical Summary

Type
5 Min
15 Min
Hourly
Daily
Monthly
Moving AveragesSellSellSellStrong SellStrong Sell
Technical IndicatorsStrong SellStrong SellSellStrong SellBuy
SummaryStrong SellStrong SellSellStrong SellNeutral

Nanoco Group PLC Company Profile

Nanoco Group PLC Company Profile

Nanoco Group plc, together with its subsidiaries, engages in the research, development, manufacture, and licensing of cadmium and heavy-metal-free quantum dots (CFQD) and semiconductor nanomaterials for use in various commercial applications. The company offers CFQD quantum dots, which are fluorescent semiconductor nanoparticles for OLED and µLED colour conversion, QD-EL, and security tagging applications; CFQD fine color film, an optical film for use in colour conversion applications; HEATWAVE quantum dots for use in the sensor industry applications; copper indium gallium diselenide/sulfide and copper indium diselenide/sulfide nanoparticles for solar spectrum applications; and VIVODOTS nanoparticles for medical and veterinary applications. It has operations in the United Kingdom, rest of Europe, Asia, and the United States. The company was founded in 2001 and is headquartered in Manchester, the United Kingdom.

Read More
  • The three arguments put forward for an inter pares review don't make sense and that is what's unnerved investors. First argument was that it would allow Nanoco to focus on IP but as much focus would be on an inter pares review as a trial. Second is that more claims could be brought in an inter pares review than in a trial though there's no explanation why. Third and most absurdly is that more infringement units sold by Samsung will favour Nanoco's claim of IP infringement. Why? If IP has been infringed it is the same for 1 unit as it is for 1000 units.
    0
    • Any OOC settlement will have to acknowledge that Samsung infringed Nanoco's IP and all circuit boards that infringe the IP must be supplied by Nanoco going forward.
      0
      • Any update on this?
        0
        • Rumors of an early off the court settlement with Samsung and a large buyout.
          1
          • nano and Samsung mutually agreed to defer the court case from June to August. to my mind this probably means they are discussing a settlement to the patent infringement claim.
            0
            Disclaimer: Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. All CFDs (stocks, indexes, futures), cryptocurrencies, and Forex prices are not provided by exchanges but rather by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual market price, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Therefore Fusion Media doesn't bear any responsibility for any trading losses you might incur as a result of using this data.
            Fusion Media or anyone involved with Fusion Media will not accept any liability for loss or damage as a result of reliance on the information including data, quotes, charts and buy/sell signals contained within this website. Please be fully informed regarding the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, it is one of the riskiest investment forms possible.