Breaking News
Get 40% Off 0
⚠ Earnings Alert! Which stocks are poised to surge?
See the stocks on our ProPicks radar. These strategies gained 19.7% year-to-date.
Unlock full list
Close

Nanoco Group PLC (NANON)

Create Alert
New!
Create Alert
Website
  • As an alert notification
  • To use this feature, make sure you are signed-in to your account
Mobile App
  • To use this feature, make sure you are signed-in to your account
  • Make sure you are signed-in with the same user profile

Condition

Frequency

Once
%

Frequency

Frequency

Delivery Method

Status

Add to/Remove from a Portfolio Add to Watchlist
Add to Watchlist
Add Position

Position added successfully to:

Please name your holdings portfolio
 
21.03 -0.47    -2.19%
13:39:43 - Real-time Data. Currency in GBP ( Disclaimer )
  • Volume: 1,433,705
  • Bid/Ask: 20.80 / 21.95
  • Day's Range: 20.79 - 21.50
Type:  Equity
Market:  United Kingdom
ISIN:  GB00B01JLR99 
SEDOL:  B01JLR9
Nanoco 21.03 -0.47 -2.19%

Nanoco Company Profile

 
Read the Nanoco company profile to learn more about the business and the management team. View Nanoco Group PLC facts about employee data, company products and services, and contact information.
IndustrySemiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment
SectorTechnology
Employees

46

Equity Type

ORD

Nanoco Group plc, together with its subsidiaries, engages in the research, development, manufacture, and licensing of novel nanomaterials for use in various commercial applications. The company offers CFQD quantum dots consisting of fluorescent semiconductor nanoparticles for OLED and µLED colour conversion, QD-EL, and security tagging applications; and HEATWAVE quantum dots for use in biometric facial recognition, optical diagnostics, LiDAR, and night vision applications in the sensor industry. It has operations in the United States, Japan, the United Kingdom, Holland, France, Taiwan, Canada, Poland, and South Korea. The company was formerly known as Evolutec Group plc and changed its name to Nanoco Group plc in April 2009. Nanoco Group plc was founded in 2001 and is headquartered in Runcorn, the United Kingdom.

Contact Information

Address Science Centre The Heath Business and Technical Park
Runcorn, WA7 4QX
United Kingdom
Phone 44 19 2876 1422
Fax -

Top Executives

Name Age Since Title
Christopher G. J. Richards 68 2015 Independent Non-Executive Chairman
Nigel L. Pickett - 2009 Co-Founder, CTO & Executive Director
Alison Margaret Fielding 57 2017 Non-Executive Senior Independent Director
Brian Thomas Tenner 53 2018 CEO & Executive Director
Christopher Michael Batterham 67 2019 Independent Non Executive Director
Liam Gray - 2019 CFO, Company Secretary & Director
Dieter May - 2024 Independent Non-Executive Director
Jalal Bagherli - 2024 Independent Non-Executive Director
Comment Guidelines

We encourage you to use comments to engage with users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind: 

  • Enrich the conversation
  • Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed.
  • Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically.
  •  Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases.
  • NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and links within a comment will be removed
  • Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user.
  • Don’t Monopolize the Conversation. We appreciate passion and conviction, but we also believe strongly in giving everyone a chance to air their thoughts. Therefore, in addition to civil interaction, we expect commenters to offer their opinions succinctly and thoughtfully, but not so repeatedly that others are annoyed or offended. If we receive complaints about individuals who take over a thread or forum, we reserve the right to ban them from the site, without recourse.
  • Only English comments will be allowed.

Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.

NANON Price Commentary

Write your thoughts about Nanoco Group PLC
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
Post also to:
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Thanks for your comment. Please note that all comments are pending until approved by our moderators. It may therefore take some time before it appears on our website.
Duncan oatham
Duncan oatham Feb 03, 2023 8:37
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Makes no sense
Alex Crisp
Alex Crisp Jan 11, 2023 10:31
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
The last time this will ever see under 40.
Theo Marshall
Theo Marshall Jun 24, 2022 12:20
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Lol when insiders start buying near to a decision being made in a court case,it usually is a good sign.
Steve Attwood
Activmojo Jun 24, 2022 11:59
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Settling down after fund raise, court case looking very positive after PTAB Ruling all patents valid. Expecting news on orders after Runcorn factory recommissioned.
Da xy
Da xy Aug 30, 2021 16:40
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
the Ptab will soon knock Samsung into the corner then back to trial 7 days of trial before final judgement and I foresee a big win for Nanoco with damages x3 for Samsung wilfully acting in breach of Nanoco patents. at trial the knockout ********will be delivered. if Samsung doesn't see sense and throw in the towel early.
Theo Marshall
Theo Marshall Jun 29, 2021 14:13
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
The three arguments put forward for an inter pares review don't make sense and that is what's unnerved investors. First argument was that it would allow Nanoco to focus on IP but as much focus would be on an inter pares review as a trial. Second is that more claims could be brought in an inter pares review than in a trial though there's no explanation why. Third and most absurdly is that more infringement units sold by Samsung will favour Nanoco's claim of IP infringement. Why? If IP has been infringed it is the same for 1 unit as it is for 1000 units.
Theo Marshall
Theo Marshall Jun 23, 2021 13:32
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Any OOC settlement will have to acknowledge that Samsung infringed Nanoco's IP and all circuit boards that infringe the IP must be supplied by Nanoco going forward.
Shai mia
Shai mia Mar 26, 2021 12:02
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Any update on this?
Smooth Operator
Smooth_Operator Jan 06, 2021 11:40
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Rumors of an early off the court settlement with Samsung and a large buyout.
Paul Mott
Paul Mott Jun 15, 2020 14:46
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
nano and Samsung mutually agreed to defer the court case from June to August. to my mind this probably means they are discussing a settlement to the patent infringement claim.
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Add Chart to Comment
Confirm Block

Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?

By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's Investing.com's posts.

%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List

Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.

Report this comment

I feel that this comment is:

Comment flagged

Thank You!

Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Continue with Google
or
Sign up with Email