Breaking News
Get Actionable Insights with InvestingPro+: Start 7 Day FREE Trial Register here
Investing Pro 0
Ad-Free Version. Upgrade your Investing.com experience. Save up to 40% More details

Fed Watch: U.S. Central Bank Simply Out Of Touch?

By Investing.com (Darrell Delamaide/Investing.com)Market OverviewOct 18, 2021 08:16
uk.investing.com/analysis/fed-watch-us-central-bank-simply-out-of-touch-200499783
Fed Watch: U.S. Central Bank Simply Out Of Touch?
By Investing.com (Darrell Delamaide/Investing.com)   |  Oct 18, 2021 08:16
Saved. See Saved Items.
This article has already been saved in your Saved Items
 

The Federal Reserve plans to start reducing its purchases of US Treasuries in November by $10 billion a month and at the same time trim its acquisition of mortgage-backed bonds by $5 billion a month, aiming to complete the reduction in eight months, by mid-2022.

This is the so-called “illustrative” path detailed in the minutes of the September 21-22 meeting of the Federal Open Market Committee released last week. Cloaking the plan with the word illustrative simply means that barring any unforeseen data, this is what the Fed will do.

In the cryptic formulation favored for the minutes:

“Several participants indicated that they preferred to proceed with a more rapid moderation of purchases than described in the illustrative examples.”

In other words, if inflation continues to heat up, the FOMC may decide to move more quickly to taper the asset purchases. However, the minutes reiterated the committee’s belief that eventual interest-rate hikes are a separate matter, and it may well be a couple of years before they’re ready to take that step.

Or maybe not. For now, however, the FOMC is on a glide path to end asset purchases, while the question of interest rates is up in the air.

Inflation More Persistant Than Originally Assumed

The minutes and the official statement continued to speak of “maximum employment” as a distant goal, despite mounting evidence that a lot of people have no intention of coming back to work anytime soon and we may well be very near the post-pandemic maximum.

In the meantime, policymakers are slowly coming to the realization, as the minutes coyly put it, that the causes of inflation could be more persistent “than they currently assumed.”

Ain’t that the truth.

The New York Times last week noted an alarming increase in rents as home ownership eludes renters amid housing shortages and skyrocketing prices. Housing is a big component of the consumer price index, which showed a 5.4% increase on the year in September.

St. Louis Fed chief James Bullard dropped the minutes’ cloak of anonymity when he told CNBC last week that he was one of those who wanted “more rapid moderation” of the bond purchases, recommending the taper process end in the first quarter so the Fed could proceed to raising interest rates next year.

The International Monetary Fund warned last week that inflation could be more persistent than anticipated, cautioning central banks to be ready to raise rates if necessary to clip its wings. Bank of England Governor Andrew Bailey signaled again he is ready to raise rates as energy shortages are adding to inflationary pressures.

Rapidly increasing oil and gas prices are just one of the many factors conspiring to keep inflation from being transitory, but for some reason central bank policymakers maintain their idée fixe that this is all temporary.

Former Treasury Secretary Larry Summers criticized Fed policymakers for what he called their “wokeness”—a focus on social issues—instead of moving decisively to curb inflation.

“They’re defining themselves by how socially concerned they are,” he said at an event for the Institute of International Finance. The longer they wait, he suggested, the more shocking it will be when they are finally forced to act.

Fed economist Jeremy Rudd published a paper last month questioning policymakers’ widely held assumption that inflation expectations are what drives price increases and their current absence means the inflation we see before our eyes is transitory.

In the same vein, the Nobel Prize in economics went to three economists who have advocated for natural experiments, that is, that economists don’t slavishly follow their models and tweak their assumptions to make them work. Rather, they observe empirical data and draw the appropriate conclusions, like every other science.

Fed Chairman Jerome Powell, who has a law degree, is fond of referring to the Fed’s “models” when he talks about the economy, and he seems to think they are always accurate as he persists in saying inflation is transitory.

Perhaps he needs to pay more attention to real life, where prices are galloping ahead and normal people don’t have the luxury of waiting it out.

Fed Watch: U.S. Central Bank Simply Out Of Touch?
 

Related Articles

Ryan Anderson
PREVIEW: RBNZ Rate Decision By Ryan Anderson - Nov 23, 2021

RBNZ is expected to hike the OCR for a second consecutive meeting by 25bps to 0.75% OIS fully price in a hike and 19 of 20 analysts surveyed expect a 25bps increase, while the...

Fed Watch: U.S. Central Bank Simply Out Of Touch?

Add a Comment

Comment Guidelines

We encourage you to use comments to engage with users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind: 

  • Enrich the conversation
  • Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed.
  • Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically.
  •  Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases.
  • NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and links within a comment will be removed
  • Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user.
  • Don’t Monopolize the Conversation. We appreciate passion and conviction, but we also believe strongly in giving everyone a chance to air their thoughts. Therefore, in addition to civil interaction, we expect commenters to offer their opinions succinctly and thoughtfully, but not so repeatedly that others are annoyed or offended. If we receive complaints about individuals who take over a thread or forum, we reserve the right to ban them from the site, without recourse.
  • Only English comments will be allowed.

Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.

Write your thoughts here
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
Post also to:
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Thanks for your comment. Please note that all comments are pending until approved by our moderators. It may therefore take some time before it appears on our website.
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Add Chart to Comment
Confirm Block

Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?

By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's Investing.com's posts.

%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List

Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.

Report this comment

I feel that this comment is:

Comment flagged

Thank You!

Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Disclaimer: Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. All CFDs (stocks, indexes, futures) and Forex prices are not provided by exchanges but rather by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual market price, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Therefore Fusion Media doesn`t bear any responsibility for any trading losses you might incur as a result of using this data.

Fusion Media or anyone involved with Fusion Media will not accept any liability for loss or damage as a result of reliance on the information including data, quotes, charts and buy/sell signals contained within this website. Please be fully informed regarding the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, it is one of the riskiest investment forms possible.
Continue with Google
or
Sign up with Email