Cyber Monday Deal: Up to 60% off InvestingProCLAIM SALE

Exclusive - Citigroup to shutter LavaFlow stock trading venue

Published 02/12/2014, 18:37
© Reuters. Citigroup logo is pictured from the floor of the New York Stock Exchange
C
-
BARC
-
NDAQ
-

By John McCrank

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Citigroup Inc is shutting down its alternative stock trading venue LavaFlow, the bank said on Tuesday, at a time when regulatory scrutiny has increased around broker-run trading platforms, forcing banks to rethink the costs.

Critics say the alternative stock trading venues add to the fragmentation of the market, increasing complexity and costs for market participants.

"Following a recent review of the LavaFlow ECN, we have decided that our capital, resources and efforts would be better redeployed to other areas within Citi's Equities Division," Citi said in a statement. The decision was first reported by Reuters.

LavaFlow, an alternative trading system (ATS) that electronically matches buy and sell orders for listed stocks, is one of about 40 such venues competing for much of the same business as the 11 registered U.S. stock exchanges such as Nasdaq OMX Group and the New York Stock Exchange.

The Securities and Exchange Commission fined Citi $5 million on July 25, saying the bank failed to protect customer data inside LavaFlow from March 2008 through March 2011. Citi did not admit or deny the charges.

LavaFlow was the sixth largest ATS for stocks for the week of Nov. 10, according to the latest data from the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA.) The trading venue is known as an electronic communications network (ECN) that unlike like other ATSs known as "dark pools" displays some information about pending orders in the system.

Dark pools allow investors to trade anonymously and only make data available after a trade, reducing the chance that others in the market will catch wind of a buyer's or seller's intentions and move the price against them.

Citi still operates at least two dark pools.

Wells Fargo & Co shut its dark pool in October, citing a lack of customer demand.

The moves by Citi and Wells Fargo come as regulatory scrutiny has intensified over alternative trading systems on concerns about transparency. Dark pool venues in particular have come under scrutiny amid concerns their unlit markets may drive too much volume away from traditional exchanges and make it hard for investors to see demand and potentially distorting prices.

Several regulators have ongoing probes into dark pool operators and the New York state attorney general has launched a lawsuit, accusing Barclays Plc of securities fraud for activities related to its dark pool. On July 1 Goldman Sachs agreed to pay an $800,000 (509,413 pounds) fine to FINRA to settle a case over pricing rule violations in its ATS.

© Reuters. Citigroup logo is pictured from the floor of the New York Stock Exchange

SEC Chair Mary Jo White announced earlier this year that she planned to propose new rules that would require ATS operators to disclose more details to the public about the way they operate.

(Editing by Chizu Nomiyama and Jeffrey Benkoe)

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.