🧐 ProPicks AI October update is out now! See which stocks made the listPick Stocks with AI

UK Employees Report Higher Pay Reviews In 2016, But Average Wages Rise

Published 01/05/2016, 08:29
Updated 05/03/2021, 15:50

Survey data collected in March and April point to disappointingly weak UK pay reviews in 2016, though wage pressures have picked up slightly compared to 2015.

The representative survey of 3,000 British households, compiled by Markit, using data collected by Ipsos MORI, found that around one-third of all employees had received a pay review so far this year. Of these, one-in-three (34 percent) report their pay to have been frozen this year, while 3 percent are suffering a pay cut. Although 64 percent are reporting their pay to have been revised higher, only 23 percent are reporting an increase of more than 2%.

The survey responses collectively point to employee pay reviews leading to an average pre-tax salary increase of just 1.3% this year, higher than the 1.0% increase signaled for 2015 but below the 1.5% rate recorded in 2014.

Pay reviews in the public sector continue to lag behind the private sector, with salary growth rates of 1.6% and 0.9% signalled respectively, although both are up on 2015.

In the public sector, the proportion of employees reporting a pay cut or freeze rises to 51 percent compared to 28 percent in the private sector. Only 13 percent of public employees indicated that their pay will grow by more than 2% in 2016, but this rises to 29 percent in the private sector.

Particularly weak pay reviews were again reported at the lower end of the pay spectrum. Those earning less than £15,000 per annum are set to see salaries rise by an estimated 0.7%, but this rises to 1.6% for those earning approximately £35-58K, with the highest earners (above £58,000) seeing a 1.4% increase.

UK pay reviews

UK Pay Reviews

Q. Has your employer conducted a pay review this year (i.e. since January)? Please choose one answer.

1) No pay review

2) Yes, my pay has been frozen

3) Yes, my pay has been revised upwards*

4) Yes, my pay has been revised downwards*

5) Not applicable

* Subsequent question: Can you please specify to the closest number, the percentage this change has involved?

Source: Markit.

Implied expected pay growth

Implied Expected Pay Growth

The above estimates are calculated by weighting the percentages of respondents reporting each pay growth band by the mid-point percent change of each band (e.g. 1 percent is the mid-point for the 0.1-1.99 percent wage increase band). The average of the 5 percent+ pay band is assumed at 7.5 percent and the average pay cut is assumed at -1.5 percent.
2016 data are provisional, based on pay reviews from 600 employees compared to 1,300 in 2014 and 5,700 in 2015.
Source: Markit.

Commenting on the survey, Chris Williamson, Chief Economist at Markit:

“Although employees have so far this year seen pay reviews improving on those received last year, and rising comfortably above inflation, at 1.3% the average increase remains modest and unlikely to be of concern to hawks at the Bank of England, where an inflation rate of 2.0% is being targeted.

“The survey data suggest that low inflation, running at just 0.5% in March and 0.3% in the first two months of the year, appears to be keeping a lid on pay growth for the vast majority (typically over 95%) of employees who remain in continuous employment.

“However, it also appears that tighter labour market conditions mean the average pay review has risen above current inflation. Pay reviews are especially weak at the lower end of the pay spectrum, typically representing lower skilled or poorly experienced workers. Higher earners, in contrast, who are typically higher skilled and experienced, have been awarded relatively higher pay reviews on average. However, even at this upper end of the market the rate of pay increase remains low by historical standards.

“Recruitment agencies report more buoyant pay conditions for those starting new jobs, most likely reflecting the tightness of the labour market. Employers have increasingly had to offer higher salaries to attract staff, as rising employment and dwindling unemployment has limited the number of suitable candidates to fill vacant positions. However, these workers are very much in the minority.”

Private sector pay reviews

Private Sector Pay Reviews

Public sector pay reviews

Public Sector Pay Reviews

Disclaimer: The intellectual property rights to these data provided herein are owned by or licensed to Markit Economics Limited. Any unauthorised use, including but not limited to copying, distributing, transmitting or otherwise of any data appearing is not permitted without Markit’s prior consent. Markit shall not have any liability, duty or obligation for or relating to the content or information (“data”) contained herein, any errors, inaccuracies, omissions or delays in the data, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon.

In no event shall Markit be liable for any special, incidental, or consequential damages, arising out of the use of the data. Purchasing Managers' Index™ and PMI™ are either registered trademarks of Markit Economics Limited or licensed to Markit Economics Limited. Markit is a registered trade mark of Markit Group Limited."

Latest comments

Loading next article…
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.