IHS Markit's PMI business surveys provide leading signals of economic change ahead of comparable official data. In this example we look at how the UK PMI surveys accurately foretold of an economic collapse in 2008 some eight months before official GDP data signalled a decline.
Moreover, misleading signals sent by GDP for the second quarter of 2008, which have since been revised lower in line with the PMI, contributed to a delay in the policy response from the Bank of England to the global financial crisis.
PMI in contraction territory in April 2008; the start of a major downturn
In April 2008, the UK all-sector PMI output index (covering manufacturing, services and construction) fell below the no-change level of 50 signalling economic decline. Although at 49.8 the index was only marginally inside contraction territory, it was notable in being the lowest reading for five years.
The survey painted a markedly different, and gloomier, picture of the health of the economy than the official data available at that time. GDP had risen 0.4% in the first quarter of 2008, according to the Office for National Statistic's initial estimate, presenting no hint at any economic downturn and encouraging the UK Treasury to stick to its forecast that GDP growth would be 1¾% to 2¼% in 2008. The Bank of England's Monetary Policy Committee had meanwhile voted 8-1 in favour of keeping interest rates unchanged at the May 2008 meeting.
The five-year low April 2008 reading was the start of a dramatically weak second quarter. By June 2008, the all-sector PMI output index had sunk to 45.3, its lowest since comparable data were available in 1998 and indicative of GDP falling at a quarterly rate of approximately 0.6% (1) . The index fell further in July, to 45.2.
However, these worrying ten-year-low PMI readings again contrasted with the official GDP data that were then released for the second quarter, the initial estimate of which - released in July - put quarter-on-quarter growth at 0.2%.
The GDP reading contributed to the MPC once again voting to keeping policy unchanged in August 2008, with one of the eight committee members even voting for higher interest rates, concerned about spiking price pressures, with just one member voting for a cut. The Minutes also noted that "The Committee's central projection was for output to be broadly flat in the early part of the forecast period" and that "economic growth was projected to pick up gradually thereafter".
In September 2008 the MPC continued to vote to keep policy unchanged, albeit with D Blanchflower now arguing for a 50 basis point cut
We now know that the GDP data were in fact sending seriously misleading signals to the policymakers.
The 0.2% increase in GDP in the second quarter of 2008 has subsequently been revised down to register a 0.6% contraction of the economy, in line with the PMI readings at that time.
GDP data finally start to signal a downturn in October 2008
It was not until 24th October 2008, with the publication of the third quarter GDP data showing a 0.6% contraction of the economy, that the official GDP data signalled any marked deterioration in the UK economy's health.
Note that by the time the official GDP data had started to signal an economic decline. the PMI's all sector output index had collapsed to a new all-time low of 44.1 and had been signalling contraction for some six months.
The delay in the GDP data responding to real world events meant it was also not until October 2008 that the MPC voted to cut interest rates, from 5.0% to 4.5%, with the third quarter GDP collapse encouraging a further slashing of base rate to 3.0% in November 2008.
This delay in loosening policy is clearly highlighted when policy decisions are tracked against the PMI:
"Disclaimer: The intellectual property rights to these data provided herein are owned by or licensed to Markit Economics Limited. Any unauthorised use, including but not limited to copying, distributing, transmitting or otherwise of any data appearing is not permitted without Markit’s prior consent. Markit shall not have any liability, duty or obligation for or relating to the content or information (“data”) contained herein, any errors, inaccuracies, omissions or delays in the data, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon.
In no event shall Markit be liable for any special, incidental, or consequential damages, arising out of the use of the data. Purchasing Managers' Index™ and PMI™ are either registered trademarks of Markit Economics Limited or licensed to Markit Economics Limited. Markit is a registered trade mark of Markit Group Limited."