Get 40% Off
🚨 Volatile Markets? Find Hidden Gems for Serious Outperformance
Find Stocks Now

UK should only hold immigrants in detention centres for 28 days, inquiry says

Published 19/09/2023, 12:04
Updated 19/09/2023, 15:45
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: A detainee inside Brook House Immigration Removal Centre gestures as demonstrators protest outside of it against a planned deportation of asylum seekers from Britain to Rwanda, at Gatwick Airport near Crawley, Britain, June 12, 2022. REUTERS/T

By Sam Tobin

LONDON (Reuters) - Britain should only hold people in immigration detention for a maximum of 28 days, a public inquiry concluded on Tuesday, after finding some detainees had been subjected to inhumane treatment, including the use of force or dangerous methods of restraint.

About 20,000 people are currently detained in one of seven immigration removal centres, awaiting either deportation or permission to enter Britain.

There is currently no limit on how long someone can be detained, though it will usually be unlawful to keep someone in detention if they cannot be removed within a reasonable time.

However, some detainees at Brook House immigration removal centre near Gatwick Airport in southeast England were held for up to two years, the inquiry heard.

Britain's Illegal Migration Act, which comes into force later this month, will allow ministers to decide for how long a person can be reasonably detained.

Tuesday's report comes as Britain's ruling Conservatives and the opposition Labour party spar over the issue of immigration, which is set to be a major battleground in a national election expected next year.

The inquiry was prompted by a BBC documentary which revealed that staff employed by outsourcing company G4S (CSE:G4S), which ran Brook House, repeatedly physically and verbally abused detainees.

'DEGRADING TREATMENT'

Inquiry chair Kate Eves found 19 incidents between April and August 2017, which she said amounted to a breach of detainees' right to freedom from inhuman or degrading treatment.

She found that force was used against detainees too often and that "dangerous techniques" of restraining individuals were used by staff.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

"The culture amongst G4S staff at Brook House was at times described to me by witnesses as 'toxic'. I have reached the same conclusion," Eves said.

"I have rejected the narrative portrayed by both the Home Office and G4S in their evidence that the events at Brook House were primarily the result of a small minority of G4S staff."

A Home Office spokesperson said the abuse of detainees at Brook House in 2017 was unacceptable, but that the government had made significant improvements since then and would endeavour "to ensure these events never happen again".

A G4S spokesperson said the company was "appalled" by the conduct of some of its former employees in 2017 and apologised.

The G4S spokesperson said the company no longer runs Brook House, which is now run by Serco, or any other immigration removal centres.

Lewis Kett, from the law firm Duncan Lewis which represented six former detainees, said the government should implement the report's recommendations to "prevent more needless suffering".

Medical Justice, a charity which supports people in immigration removal centres, called on the government to phase out detention and consider alternatives.

Prime Minister Rishi Sunak has made "stopping the boats" a priority, with many asylum seekers arriving in Britain from Europe across the Channel.

But his government's flagship policy of sending asylum seekers to Rwanda has failed to get off the ground, with a legal challenge being heard by the Supreme Court next month.

Latest comments

Should be removed from the country on day one.
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.