Selloff or Market Correction? Either Way, Here's What to Do NextSee Overvalued Stocks

Goldman, JPMorgan, Morgan Stanley, UBS in $499 million stock lending settlement

Published 23/08/2023, 22:14
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO-A logo of Swiss bank UBS is seen in Zurich, Switzerland March 29, 2023. REUTERS/Denis Balibouse/File Photo
BAC
-
GS
-
JPM
-
MS
-
UBSG
-

By Jonathan Stempel

NEW YORK (Reuters) -Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan Chase (NYSE:JPM), Morgan Stanley (NYSE:MS) and UBS have agreed to pay $499 million to settle an antitrust lawsuit by investors who accused them of conspiring to stifle competition in the stock lending market.

The settlement was disclosed on Wednesday in a filing in Manhattan federal court.

It requires a judge's approval, and also mandates governance changes at EquiLend, a joint venture among the defendants.

Led by four pension funds and a trading firm, the plaintiffs accused the banks of having conspired since 2009 to relegate the stock lending market to "the stone age" by boycotting startup platforms.

They said the banks did this by using their positions on EquiLend's board to maintain monopoly control over the market, and charge excessive fees to investors.

Investors have now reached $580 million of settlements with five banks, including an $81 million accord in Feb. 2022 with Credit Suisse (SIX:CSGN), which UBS bought in June.

The banks denied wrongdoing but settled to avoid the risk, cost and inconvenience of further litigation, court papers show.

They also agreed to cooperate in the investors' case against the final defendant, Bank of America. The lawsuit began in Aug. 2017.

Spokespeople for Bank of America and UBS declined to comment. The other banks did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

The U.S. Department of the Treasury's Financial Stability Oversight Council has estimated that $3.1 trillion of securities were on loan worldwide as of Sept. 2021.

EquiLend's governance changes include new restrictions on how board members share information, and limits on how many board seats each bank can hold.

© Reuters. FILE PHOTO-A logo of Swiss bank UBS is seen in Zurich, Switzerland March 29, 2023. REUTERS/Denis Balibouse/File Photo

They also include a requirement that the board's outside antitrust lawyers be "rotated" every three years, to avoid what the investors call the "capture" of those lawyers.

The case is Iowa Public Employees' Retirement System et al v Bank of America Corp (NYSE:BAC) et al, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 17-06221.

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.