x
Breaking News
0

Britain's finance industry scales back EU market access demands

Stock MarketsJan 12, 2017 13:08
Saved. See Saved Items.
This article has already been saved in your Saved Items
 
© Reuters. People walk accross a plaza in the Canary Wharf financial district at rush hour during a strike on the Underground by members of two unions in protest at ticket office closures and reduced staffing levels, in London

By Andrew MacAskill and Huw Jones

LONDON (Reuters) - Britain's finance industry has reluctantly given up on efforts to keep full access to the European Union after Brexit and is pushing instead for a more limited trade deal that would potentially exclude some financial products.

Banks, insurers and asset managers have concluded there is no realistic chance of maintaining full passporting rights after Brexit that would allow them to sell all their services across the 28-nation bloc from Britain.

TheCityUK, the country's most powerful financial lobby group, instead called on Thursday for limited market access for some finance sectors based on a pact in which Britain and the EU would accept each other's rules.

Such an "equivalence" arrangement would keep the door open for cross-border trading of stocks and bonds, and sales of certain other products.

TheCityUK document is the first attempt to condense the industry's priorities after months of conflicting lobbying and comes just two months before Britain plans EU divorce talks.

"I am confident that this represents in broad shape the key priorities for the industry," TheCityUK Chief Executive Officer Miles Celic told Reuters.

    "There are a multiple number of documents out there of stuff at significant length. So there was a sense among our membership to filter down what the key asks were into a single place."

The future of London as Europe's financial centre is one of the biggest issues in Brexit talks because it is Britain's largest export sector and biggest source of corporate tax revenue.

DOSE OF REALITY

By pushing for an equivalence deal there is a risk that some financial sectors may be excluded from any final settlement. There is currently no equivalence regime for commercial banking or some forms of insurance.

Separately on Thursday, the Financial Services Negotiation Forum of pro and anti-Brexit financiers also said that Britain should seek a "bespoke" form of equivalence to maintain market access.

The current equivalence regime is not a "silver bullet" solution that can replace passporting in its entirety, it said in a report with law firm Norton Rose Fulbright.

Daniel Hodson, chairman of the forum's executive committee, said the financial sector was now coalescing around equivalence after having had time to consider how it could work.

"There is considerably increased realism now that people have begun to really focus on the issues and get their mind round them," Hodson said.

Until now, finance organisations have clashed over who should be leading efforts to lobby the government and what their Brexit response should be.

After the June vote, business leaders begged for Britain to stay inside the single market, for example, by having a Norway-style deal that would provide full access to Europe's markets.

But EU leaders have repeatedly warned that single market access is defined by the bloc's four freedoms — free movement of goods, capital, services and people — and that they cannot be unpicked.

TheCityUK proposals call for "clear and upfront transitional arrangements" to bridge the gap between leaving the EU and the start of a bespoke deal, though they do not specify a timeframe.

Britain's finance industry scales back EU market access demands
 

Related Articles

Add a Comment

Comment Guidelines

We encourage you to use comments to engage with users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind: 

  • Enrich the conversation
  • Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed.
  • Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically.
  •  Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases.
  • NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and links within a comment will be removed
  • Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user.
  • Don’t Monopolize the Conversation. We appreciate passion and conviction, but we also believe strongly in giving everyone a chance to air their thoughts. Therefore, in addition to civil interaction, we expect commenters to offer their opinions succinctly and thoughtfully, but not so repeatedly that others are annoyed or offended. If we receive complaints about individuals who take over a thread or forum, we reserve the right to ban them from the site, without recourse.
  • Only English comments will be allowed.

Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.

 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Write your thoughts here
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
Post
Post also to:
1000
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Thanks for your comment. Please note that all comments are pending until approved by our moderators. It may therefore take some time before it appears on our website.
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
Post 1000
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
 
 
 
Report this comment

I feel that this comment is:

Comment flagged

Thank You!

Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Add Chart to Comment
Disclaimer: Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. All CFDs (stocks, indexes, futures) and Forex prices are not provided by exchanges but rather by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual market price, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Therefore Fusion Media doesn`t bear any responsibility for any trading losses you might incur as a result of using this data.

Fusion Media or anyone involved with Fusion Media will not accept any liability for loss or damage as a result of reliance on the information including data, quotes, charts and buy/sell signals contained within this website. Please be fully informed regarding the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, it is one of the riskiest investment forms possible.
Continue with Google
or
Sign up with Email