Breaking News
Investing Pro 0
NEW! Get Actionable Insights with InvestingPro+ Try 7 Days Free

Grilling over Scholz's handling of multibillion-euro tax fraud ends in stand-off

Economy Aug 19, 2022 19:26
Saved. See Saved Items.
This article has already been saved in your Saved Items
 
2/2 © Reuters. FILE PHOTO: German Chancellor Olaf Scholz attends a news conference with Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas, in Berlin, Germany, August 16, 2022. REUTERS/Lisi Niesner/File Photo 2/2

By Andreas Rinke and Sarah Marsh

BERLIN (Reuters) -A grilling by Hamburg lawmakers of German Chancellor Olaf Scholz over his handling of a multibillion-euro tax fraud when he served as the city's mayor ended in a stalemate on Friday as Scholz denied any impropriety and opposition lawmakers accused him of obfuscating the truth.

Although the 3-1/2-hour hearing yielded no new insights into the "cum-ex" scandal, the fact the case is dragging on threatens to undermine the chancellor, who is struggling to hold his fractious coalition together in the face of public discontent over soaring energy costs.

In the scheme of "cum-ex," or dividend stripping, banks and investors would swiftly trade shares of companies around their dividend payout day, blurring stock ownership and allowing multiple parties to falsely reclaim tax rebates on dividends.

The loophole, now closed, took on a political dimension in the northern port of Hamburg due to authorities' sluggishness in 2016 when Scholz was mayor in demanding repayment of millions of euros gained under the scheme by local bank Warburg.

Warburg, which plays a big role in Germany's second largest city, eventually paid its tax bill of around 50 million euros ($50.3 million) after the federal finance ministry intervened.

"I did not exert any influence on the Warburg tax case," Scholz said on Friday during his second appearance in front of the Hamburg parliamentary committee of inquiry into the cum-ex affair, one of Germany's biggest post-war corporate scandals.

"There is nowhere even the tiniest suggestion that I agreed anything," he said, referring to dozens of other testimonies before the committee during 2-1/2 years of investigation.

Scholz again insisted he could not remember the content of the three meetings he had at the time with the Warburg chairman, adding that he met with representatives of other banks, too, as mayor.

"The chancellor, in effect, refused today to participate in the investigation," said Richard Seelmaecker, representative of the opposition conservatives on the committee, quipping that Scholz should undergo hypnosis to recovery his lost memories.

Seelmaecker said Scholz could be called to testify before lawmakers for a third time as new findings from the investigation were just emerging.

The chancellor's popularity is lagging that of his economy and foreign ministers, while just 58% of Germans think he is doing a good job compared to an average of around 70% for his predecessor, Angela Merkel, during her 16 years in office.

His Social Democratic Party (SPD) has slipped into third place in polls behind the opposition conservatives and junior coalition partners the Greens.

200,000 EUROS IN A SAFE

Finance Minister Christian Lindner, from the junior coalition party, the pro-business Free Democrats, which is also lagging in polls, lent the chancellor his support on Friday.

"I have always understood Olaf Scholz to be a person of integrity, whether I was in the opposition or as now in government - and I have no reason to doubt that now," Lindner told the Rheinische Post newspaper.

Prominent Greens have kept quiet on the affair after criticising Scholz about it while in opposition.

Recent headlines that prosecutors probing the scheme in Hamburg discovered 200,000 euros in the safe of a local politician from Scholz's ruling Social Democrats reignited suspicions of political intervention on the bank's behalf.

Scholz has denied any knowledge of the cash or its origin and said he no longer has contact with the lawmaker involved. The lawmaker did not respond to a request for comment.

"I harbour the hope that conjectures and insinuations may stop," Scholz said. "They lack any foundation."

The chancellor had faced Hamburg lawmakers last year.

Gerhard Schick, director of watchdog Finance Watch Germany and a former Greens lawmaker in the federal Bundestag lower house of parliament, said he did not believe in Scholz's forgetfulness.

"I think that is pretence and it hurts his credibility," he said.

One of the prosecutors' recent findings is a discrepancy between the many calendar entries of Hamburg authorities mentioning the Warburg bank and "cum-ex" and the few emails on the topic, Der Spiegel magazine wrote, citing the prosecutors report.

"This suggests a targeted deletion (of emails)," Spiegel cited the report as saying.

($1 = 0.9939 euros)

Grilling over Scholz's handling of multibillion-euro tax fraud ends in stand-off
 

Related Articles

Add a Comment

Comment Guidelines

We encourage you to use comments to engage with users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind: 

  • Enrich the conversation
  • Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed.
  • Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically.
  •  Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases.
  • NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and links within a comment will be removed
  • Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user.
  • Don’t Monopolize the Conversation. We appreciate passion and conviction, but we also believe strongly in giving everyone a chance to air their thoughts. Therefore, in addition to civil interaction, we expect commenters to offer their opinions succinctly and thoughtfully, but not so repeatedly that others are annoyed or offended. If we receive complaints about individuals who take over a thread or forum, we reserve the right to ban them from the site, without recourse.
  • Only English comments will be allowed.

Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.

Write your thoughts here
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
Post also to:
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Thanks for your comment. Please note that all comments are pending until approved by our moderators. It may therefore take some time before it appears on our website.
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Add Chart to Comment
Confirm Block

Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?

By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's Investing.com's posts.

%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List

Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.

Report this comment

I feel that this comment is:

Comment flagged

Thank You!

Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Continue with Google
or
Sign up with Email