Cyber Monday Deal: Up to 60% off InvestingProCLAIM SALE

Former Rabobank traders convicted in U.S. trial over Libor rigging

Published 05/11/2015, 17:38
© Reuters. Allen arrives at federal court in Manhattan
C
-

By Nate Raymond and Brendan Pierson

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Two former Rabobank traders were found guilty of fraud on Thursday in the first U.S. trial arising from a global investigation into whether banks sought to manipulate the interest rate known as Libor.

Anthony Allen, Rabobank's former global head of liquidity and finance, and Anthony Conti, a former senior trader, were found guilty by a federal jury in Manhattan on all counts of conspiracy and wire fraud they faced.

The verdict marked a victory for the U.S. Justice Department, which brought charges against the British citizens a year after the Netherlands-based bank in October 2013 reached a $1 billion deal resolving related U.S. and European probes.

"Today's verdicts illustrate the department's successful efforts to hold accountable bank executives responsible for this global fraud scheme," Leslie Caldwell, head of the Justice Department's criminal division, said in a statement.

Allen, 44, slumped over a table in court as the jury foreman read the verdict, while Conti, 46, held his head up. Lawyers for both men said they planned to appeal.

"This is just round one," Michael Schachter, Allen's lawyer, said. "Tony Allen looks forward to pursuing all available options. He is disappointed with the verdict."

Libor, or the London interbank offered rate, is a short-term rate financial institutions charge each other for loans that is calculated based on submissions by a panel of banks. Hundreds of trillions of dollars in financial products are priced based on Libor, globally.

The case was the first by the Justice Department to go to trial following global investigations into whether banks submitted artificial rate estimates to bolster profits on trading derivatives tied to Libor.

Those investigations resulted in charges against 22 people in the United States and United Kingdom and around $9 billion in regulatory settlements with financial institutions.

Their trial follows an earlier one in London involving yen Libor manipulation that led to the conviction of Tom Hayes, a former UBS AG and Citigroup Inc (N:C) trader who was sentenced in August to 14 years in prison.

Another trial is meanwhile ongoing in London for six former brokers accused of manipulating yen Libor rates. They have pleaded not guilty.

Among the 13 people charged by the Justice Department were seven former Rabobank traders, including Allen and Conti, who earlier this year waived their right to extradition to fight the charges.

Prosecutors said Allen, 44, and Conti, 46, participated in a five-year conspiracy at Rabobank to rig U.S. dollar and yen Libor rates in order to gain an unfair advantage trading derivatives linked to the rate.

Prosecutors relied on testimony by three former Rabobank traders who pleaded guilty as part of cooperation deals, as well as emails and instant messages they sent at the time.

Libor was supposed to be an "impartial market tool," Paul Robson, one of the traders, testified.

"But we were biasing submissions or shading it to help the traders," he said.

Lawyers for Allen and Conti countered that while others at the bank may have been trying to rig Libor, their clients had submitted honest rate estimates.

They argued prosecutors took documents out of context, and that cooperating witnesses lied about their clients' role in the scheme in hopes of getting lenient sentences.

Allen opted to testify in his own defense, telling jurors he rarely was involved personally in submitting numbers used to calculate Libor and that he in those few instances ignored traders' requests to bias the rate.

Beyond Allen, Conti and the three cooperators, U.S. prosecutors have also brought charges against two other Rabobank traders including Paul Thompson, who is facing extradition after being arrested earlier this month in Australia.

© Reuters. Allen arrives at federal court in Manhattan

The case is U.S. v. Allen, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 14-cr-272.

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.