💎 Fed’s first rate cut since 2020 set to trigger market. Find undervalued gems with Fair ValueSee Undervalued Stocks

Hinman's Insights: How The Former SEC Director Shaped Crypto Regulatory Landscape

Published 13/06/2023, 18:22
© Reuters.  Hinman's Insights: How The Former SEC Director Shaped Crypto Regulatory Landscape

Benzinga - William Hinman, the former director of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission's (SEC) Division of Corporation Finance, discussed with Ethereum (CRYPTO: ETH) co-founder Vitalik Buterin in 2018 about how the Ethereum Foundation operates.

Documents show how Hinman, at the time, believed Ethereum's native currency didn't warrant being regulated as a security.

Ripple Labs (CRYPTO: XRP) has repeatedly cited this position in defense against the SEC’s recent claims.

Also Read: The Great Decoupling: Bitcoin And Equities Correlation Diminishing Post-Pandemic

The documents shed light on the internal conversations within the SEC leading up to Hinman's speech, where he put forth the view that Bitcoin (CRYPTO: BTC) and Ether were not securities.

A revelation from an email that surfaced on Tuesday stated that an official from the SEC was keen to assert that they did “not … see a need to regulate Ether” in its 2018 form.

Former SEC Director of Trading and Markets, Brett Redfearn, said in 2018: “As written, the language remains vague as to whether ETH is a security. If you want to make an affirmative statement that it is not a security, the language could be stronger (i.e., just say it). If you don't want to take an affirmative stance, we suggest using language similar to what you used for Bitcoin re. the disclosure regime to make it more consistent.”

Redfearn further annotated a draft of the speech, mentioning that parts of it “appear likely to create more confusion about the status of ETH.”

Valerie Szczepanik, who currently presides over the SEC’s FinHub group, suggested in an email dated May 25, 2018, “the less detail the better,” regarding what seems to be one of the initial drafts of the speech.

Laura Jarsulic, an attorney from the SEC’s Office of General Counsel, cited in an email from June 12 the Supreme Court case: SEC v. W. J. Howey Co. She recommended clarifying that the Supreme Court determined that only the purchase of land and service contracts constituted the buying of security.

Read Next: FTX Mastermind Sam Bankman-Fried Might Evade Justice For Years

© 2023 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.

Read the original article on Benzinga

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.