💎 Fed’s first rate cut since 2020 set to trigger market. Find undervalued gems with Fair ValueSee Undervalued Stocks

Big Banks Lobby For Bitcoin ETF Role, Urge SEC Rule Change

Published 16/02/2024, 18:56
© Igor Faun Big Banks Lobby For Bitcoin ETF Role, Urge SEC Rule Change

Benzinga - A coalition of leading banking and financial institutions has formally petitioned the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), under the leadership of Chair Gary Gensler, seeking amendments to a regulatory guideline known as "SAB 121."

This guideline, established in March 2022, has significantly constrained the ability of banks to engage with the burgeoning digital currency market.

Impact Of Spot Bitcoin ETPs Approval The coalition, including the Bank Policy Institute, the American Bankers Association, the Financial Services Forum, and the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association, points out that the existing regulations have unintentionally excluded banks from the digital currency space, especially concerning Bitcoin Exchange-Traded Products (ETPs).

"As the two-year anniversary of the issuance of SAB 121 approaches, we believe now would be an appropriate time to examine and discuss the implications of SAB 121 for regulated banking organizations," the group mentioned in their letter to Gensler, marking the approval of Spot Bitcoin ETPs as a crucial turning point that necessitates regulatory adjustments.

Addressing Regulatory Concerns And Proposing Solutions The coalition's main issue with SAB 121 is its on-balance sheet requirement, which they believe "negatively impacts U.S. banking organizations and investors due to the associated prudential implications."

This rule has effectively barred banks from providing scalable custodial services for digital assets. Additionally, they criticize SAB 121's broad definition of "crypto-asset" for limiting the use of distributed ledger technology (DLT) in documenting traditional financial assets.

Also Read: Bitcoin Booms, But Retail Sleeps: Are Investors Wary Or Just Unaware?

"The breadth of the definition of 'crypto-asset' in SAB 121 will have a chilling effect on banking organizations’ ability to develop responsible use cases for DLT more broadly," the letter states.

The banking groups are pushing for "targeted modifications to SAB 121" to participate in digital asset services without undermining the goals of investor protection and market integrity.

They suggest refining the definition of crypto-assets and exempting banking organizations from certain on-balance sheet treatments while maintaining disclosure requirements.

"We believe the recommendations set forth in this letter are consistent with those principles and would remove unintended barriers for well-regulated U.S. banking organizations to engage in certain activities," the coalition remarked, showing their readiness to work with the SEC on adjusting the regulatory framework for digital assets.

Read Next: Coinbase Rides The Bitcoin ETF Wave: Why JPMorgan Is No Longer Bearish On Crypto Exchange

Image created using artificial intelligence with MidJourney.

© 2024 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.

Read the original article on Benzinga

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.