Breaking News
Investing Pro 0
Final hours: unlock premium data with Claim 60% OFF

Carbon storage under the North Sea - what's all the fuss?

Published Jul 31, 2023 13:59 Updated Jul 31, 2023 14:10
Saved. See Saved Items.
This article has already been saved in your Saved Items
 
Carbon storage under the North Sea - what's all the fuss?
 
UK100
+0.54%
Add to/Remove from a Portfolio
Add to Watchlist
Add Position

Position added successfully to:

Please name your holdings portfolio
 
DRX
+0.88%
Add to/Remove from a Portfolio
Add to Watchlist
Add Position

Position added successfully to:

Please name your holdings portfolio
 
NG
-0.56%
Add to/Remove from a Portfolio
Add to Watchlist
Add Position

Position added successfully to:

Please name your holdings portfolio
 
HBR
+1.28%
Add to/Remove from a Portfolio
Add to Watchlist
Add Position

Position added successfully to:

Please name your holdings portfolio
 
SHEL
+1.59%
Add to/Remove from a Portfolio
Add to Watchlist
Add Position

Position added successfully to:

Please name your holdings portfolio
 

Proactive Investors - Monday saw the government renew commitments to North Sea oil and gas, paired with an update on the UK’s ambition to roll out carbon capture en masse.

Though dwarfed by the controversial confirmation that hundreds upon hundreds of new oil and gas licences would be granted in UK waters, Monday’s announcement also confirmed areas in the Humber and Scotland would be used as carbon capture “clusters”.

Dubbed projects ‘Acorn’ and ‘Viking,’ the plans will see carbon capture installed in the industrial areas by 2030, following the conversion of two other sites this decade.

These projects will ultimately aim to reduce emissions from the UK’s industrial sector, Aided by a promised £20bn in government funding.

However, given the ambitious nature of the government’s master plan to pump this captured carbon under the North Sea rather than release it, questions have been raised.

So how does it work?

Carbon capture has long since been suggested as a tool for aiding to UK’s journey toward net zero, with the idea in essence centred around preventing emissions from reaching the atmosphere.

This is done by separating carbon dioxide emitted from the likes of factories, compressing it to be transported via pipes or ship to former storage sites, such as depleted, oil reserves, where it is then injected for permanent storage.

Given empty wells off UK shores promise enough storage for the equivalent of the country’s emissions since the industrial revolution, it is hardly a surprise such plans have been laid out.

According to the North Sea Transition Authority, this figure equates to around 78 gigatons of storage capacity, with prospective investment in the sector worth £220bn by 2030.

Energy and industry, in particular, present likely candidates for the technology, the National Grid (LON:NG) explains, given technology can be built into existing static infrastructure.

Drax Group (LON:DRX), for instance, has plans in place to retrofit its north Yorkshire-based biomass energy plant with carbon capture technology in order to restrict emissions.

Though the FTSE 250-listed generator is yet to confirm the multi-billion-pound investment given its previous qualms over government support, Drax did hail Monday’s news.

“The announcement shows the importance of [and] creates an additional pathway to support our plans for bioenergy with carbon capture and storage at Drax Power Station.

“We are currently engaged in productive discussions with the UK Government on this project,” the company commented, with its power site situated near the ‘Viking’ site.

Viking and Acorn projects

By using existing infrastructure, the Acorn and Viking carbon capture projects will aim to provide industrial emitters in Scotland and near the Humber estuary with ways to transport their captured emissions.

According to London-listed Harbour Energy (LON:HBR), which is involved in both projects, the latter alone could see 15mln tonnes of CO2 captured and stored annually by 2035.

Some £7bn of investment could be unlocked by the plan, Harbour added, providing a boost for the Humber region while aiding the UK’s targeted 30mln tonnes of stored carbon by 2030.

Shell PLC (LON:SHEL), the technical lead of the Acorn project, dubbed the plans as “central” in decarbonising both North Sea and industrial operations meanwhile.

Criticism

However, not everyone is so convinced by the use of carbon capture.

Aside from the rosy comments from those involved, climate activists and experts have raised doubts over the idea echoing the same main point: carbon-emitting fuels are still being burned.

Climate group Greenpeace accused oil and gas companies of using carbon capture as a means of “greenwashing,” arguing it simply allows the sector to continue polluting.

“It’s worth noting that carbon capture is not zero carbon [and] is unlikely to see dramatic cost reductions or be scalable,” the group said.

Leaks from storage sites could potentially wipe out efforts to prevent carbon from reaching the atmosphere meanwhile, the London School of Economics has argued previously, also raising concern over the high costs of such projects.

Read more on Proactive Investors UK

Disclaimer

Carbon storage under the North Sea - what's all the fuss?
 

Related Articles

Add a Comment

Comment Guidelines

We encourage you to use comments to engage with users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind: 

  • Enrich the conversation
  • Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed.
  • Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically.
  •  Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases.
  • NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and links within a comment will be removed
  • Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user.
  • Don’t Monopolize the Conversation. We appreciate passion and conviction, but we also believe strongly in giving everyone a chance to air their thoughts. Therefore, in addition to civil interaction, we expect commenters to offer their opinions succinctly and thoughtfully, but not so repeatedly that others are annoyed or offended. If we receive complaints about individuals who take over a thread or forum, we reserve the right to ban them from the site, without recourse.
  • Only English comments will be allowed.

Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.

Write your thoughts here
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
Post also to:
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Thanks for your comment. Please note that all comments are pending until approved by our moderators. It may therefore take some time before it appears on our website.
Comments (2)
Rafeybacon OConnor
Rafeybacon OConnor Aug 01, 2023 6:57
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
20B to capture an insignificant amount of CO2 both on a domestic scale and even more meaningless amount globally
Doug McIntyre
dMCI Jul 31, 2023 14:36
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Why would you spend £20,000,000,000 on a project with NO human value when you could spent it on the NHS or SCHOOLS.
carbonatt Carbonatt
carbonatt Carbonatt Jul 31, 2023 14:36
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
So why carbon capture projects lack “human value” according to you?
James ZZ
James ZZ Jul 31, 2023 14:36
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
lol. look beyond your own desires. Your short-sightedness would screw us all.
Malcolm Catling
Malcolm Catling Jul 31, 2023 14:36
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
let's get rid of oil and gas then import it from abroad just for oil are a set of foooking clowns
Ian Law
Ian Law Jul 31, 2023 14:36
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Carbon capture isnt a balid long term solution, but it may reduce net emissions for a period of time. The long term solution is to stop polluting. And not just carbon, plastic, sewerage, food waste, and everything else. Im not a green but a blind man can see that pollution is bad and alwats gas been.
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Add Chart to Comment
Confirm Block

Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?

By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's Investing.com's posts.

%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List

Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.

Report this comment

I feel that this comment is:

Comment flagged

Thank You!

Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Continue with Google
or
Sign up with Email