- IHS Markit’s New Orders Index has been a more reliable indicator of official manufacturing output growth than official factory orders data
- The IHS Markit PMI also outperforms ISM data
For analysts wanting an advance guide to US durable goods orders, factory orders and manufacturing output, IHS Markit’s PMI survey New Orders Index offers valuable insight into the latest trends, exhibiting a correlation of 89% with official data.
Using orders to predict output
The Bureau of Census issues two monthly releases of manufacturing orders data: an advance report on orders for durable goods (items intended to last the user many years, such as automobiles and televisions) which is followed later in the month by a more complete picture of total factory orders. Durable goods orders are thought to be especially important, as orders for such goods may affect factory production in future months. Some are even made-to-order, so won’t be met from existing inventory stock.
Importantly, durable orders are available ahead of official manufacturing production data from the Federal Reserve and, as our first chart below shows, the correlation with manufacturing output is indeed close. Over the last decade, durable goods orders and factory orders exhibit a correlation of 81% and 80% respectively, using a quarterly (or three-month-on-three-month) rate of change.
However, the predictive power of the Bureau of Census orders data over output is let down by a major false signal in 2014-2015, when orders data were far more volatile than official output data.
A more reliable indicator of output is in fact provided by IHS Markit’s PMI survey, from which the manufacturing New Orders Index has exhibited an 89% correlation with Federal Reserve manufacturing output data over the past decade. As with the Bureau of Census data, the fit from the PMI is weaker between 2014 and 2015, though the PMI survey appears to have a closer fit with the output series.
Predicting orders data
The PMI survey data can of course also be used to predict official factory orders and durable goods orders. The manufacturing PMI New Orders Index has exhibited a 76% correlation with both over the past ten years. The period 2014-2015 is notable in the disparities between the two series, with official data collapsing more than survey data. Excluding this period, the correlations rise to around 85%.
Factory orders
Durable goods orders
Survey v official data correlations
PMI monthly values compared with three-month change in official data, 2007-2017
Of note, the IHS Markit new orders data also enjoys a higher correlation with comparable official output, durable goods orders and factory orders than the ISM survey over the past ten years. Most striking has been the major divergence of the ISM data with official (and IHS Markit PMI) data through much of 2017, when the ISM numbers presented a far more buoyant picture of manufacturing than other sources. Note also that the volatile divergence between official orders data and survey data in 2014-2015 is also evident when compared with the ISM data.
Disclaimer: The intellectual property rights to these data provided herein are owned by or licensed to Markit Economics Limited. Any unauthorised use, including but not limited to copying, distributing, transmitting or otherwise of any data appearing is not permitted without Markit’s prior consent. Markit shall not have any liability, duty or obligation for or relating to the content or information (“data”) contained herein, any errors, inaccuracies, omissions or delays in the data, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon.
In no event shall Markit be liable for any special, incidental, or consequential damages, arising out of the use of the data. Purchasing Managers' Index™ and PMI™ are either registered trademarks of Markit Economics Limited or licensed to Markit Economics Limited. Markit is a registered trade mark of Markit Group Limited.