Breaking News
Get Actionable Insights with InvestingPro+: Start 7 Day FREE Trial Register here
Investing Pro 0
Ad-Free Version. Upgrade your Investing.com experience. Save up to 40% More details

Reinterpreting NFP: Does Slowing Job Growth Argue For An Immediate Taper?

By Matthew WellerForexOct 12, 2021 06:34
uk.investing.com/analysis/reinterpreting-nfp-does-slowing-job-growth-argue-for-an-immediate-taper-200499207
Reinterpreting NFP: Does Slowing Job Growth Argue For An Immediate Taper?
By Matthew Weller   |  Oct 12, 2021 06:34
Saved. See Saved Items.
This article has already been saved in your Saved Items
 

Many analysts (ourselves included – see here) viewed Friday’s disappointing 194K increase in jobs as a sign that the US labour market’s recovery may be slowing just as the Fed is likely to start removing stimulus by tapering its asset purchase program.

However, there is another interpretation of the jobs report with almost polar opposite implications for policy: Rather than being due to low demand for workers from employers, perhaps the soft jobs growth we saw last month was due to a low supply of workers that were willing to join the labour force, at least at the wages on offer? Between a growing mismatch of employee skills and employer needs, concerns about workplace safety, a lack of affordable childcare options, and government support for the unemployed, there’s a potentially convincing case that workers are no longer willing to work at certain jobs for the same pre-pandemic wages.

Digging under the surface, some of the secondary aspects of Friday’s report support the “labour shortage” thesis. For instance, the unemployment rate fell a full 0.4% to 4.8%, despite the relatively low job growth. Likewise, the Labor Force Participation Rate (LFPR) held mostly steady at 61.6%, still down nearly 2% from the pre-pandemic levels of February 2020.

Taken together, these figures suggest that fewer Americans are participating in the labour market at all. For those who are, jobs are relatively plentiful; indeed, according to the latest NFIB survey, the biggest issue for small businesses are that jobs are hard to fill, with 51% of respondents citing that concern, the highest level in decades.

So why does it matter?

As we noted above, it’s important to remain open to this interpretation of the US labour market because it augurs for almost polar opposite policies from the Federal Reserve and Congress. If potential employees are only willing to return to work for sharply higher wages, then maintaining easy policies will only exacerbate the problem and lead to stickier inflation down the road; instead, the Fed should look to start tapering immediately and potentially raise interest rates multiple times in 2022 if the labour market continues to run “hot” in this way.

How could you trade it?

The “labour shortage / sticky inflation” inflation thesis would have broad implications if it gains traction, with everything from interest rates to commodities to the greenback rising.

One specific setup that will be worth monitoring is on USD/CHF. Despite choppy price action over the last several months, the currency pair has formed a series of higher highs and higher lows within a bullish channel over the last two months. Now, rates are testing the bottom of the channel, presenting a potential low risk entry into the current uptrend:

USD/CHF Daily Chart
USD/CHF Daily Chart

Source: StoneX

If the channel holds, USD/CHF could rally to fresh 6-month highs in the low-0.9400s before encountering any meaningful resistance. That said, a break below the current channel support level would point toward a deeper retracement to at least the rising 50- and 100-day EMAs near 0.9200 next.

Original Post

Reinterpreting NFP: Does Slowing Job Growth Argue For An Immediate Taper?
 

Related Articles

Reinterpreting NFP: Does Slowing Job Growth Argue For An Immediate Taper?

Add a Comment

Comment Guidelines

We encourage you to use comments to engage with users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind: 

  • Enrich the conversation
  • Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed.
  • Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically.
  •  Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases.
  • NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and links within a comment will be removed
  • Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user.
  • Don’t Monopolize the Conversation. We appreciate passion and conviction, but we also believe strongly in giving everyone a chance to air their thoughts. Therefore, in addition to civil interaction, we expect commenters to offer their opinions succinctly and thoughtfully, but not so repeatedly that others are annoyed or offended. If we receive complaints about individuals who take over a thread or forum, we reserve the right to ban them from the site, without recourse.
  • Only English comments will be allowed.

Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.

Write your thoughts here
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
Post also to:
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Thanks for your comment. Please note that all comments are pending until approved by our moderators. It may therefore take some time before it appears on our website.
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Add Chart to Comment
Confirm Block

Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?

By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's Investing.com's posts.

%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List

Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.

Report this comment

I feel that this comment is:

Comment flagged

Thank You!

Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Disclaimer: Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. All CFDs (stocks, indexes, futures) and Forex prices are not provided by exchanges but rather by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual market price, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Therefore Fusion Media doesn`t bear any responsibility for any trading losses you might incur as a result of using this data.

Fusion Media or anyone involved with Fusion Media will not accept any liability for loss or damage as a result of reliance on the information including data, quotes, charts and buy/sell signals contained within this website. Please be fully informed regarding the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, it is one of the riskiest investment forms possible.
Continue with Google
or
Sign up with Email