- Rebound in GDP adds to survey evidence of economy growing at steady pace
- PMI acts are reliable guide to help see through volatile GDP numbers
- Survey hints at slower growth in Q3
Japanese economic growth rebounded in the second quarter, allaying fears of a bout of renewed economic malaise that had been fueled by a drop in GDP at the start of the year. The fresh data corroborate PMI surveys which had already been correctly indicating that the economy was faring well.
Reassuringly, the survey data show that the economy continued to grow at the start of the third quarter, albeit with some signs of momentum waning due to a sluggish export performance.
Problems with GDP
Accurately predicting Japanese GDP data is extremely difficult, more so than perhaps for any other major economy. Problems arise not because it's hard to know how the economy's performing, but because the initial estimates of the official data are notoriously unreliable, being prone to major revisions after initial estimates are first published.
For example, the annual fourth quarter 2017 GDP growth has been revised up from a preliminary reading of 0.5% to 2.0%.
As noted in a recent paper by Nobuo Iizuka of Kanagawa University on revisions to Japan's GDP between 2002 and 2015, "the average of the absolute value of the revision range is 0.8 points on an annual basis. This is not a small revision range for the Japanese economy which suffers from a low growth rate around less than 1%".
There are also long-standing issues with the quality of the revised data. For example, Bank of Japan research questions the weakness of the GDP data in 2014, finding that tax revenue data are consistent with an economy that performed much better than the official economic growth estimates.
For investors seeking reliable up to date indications of the health of the economy, the PMI survey data, produced by IHS Markit on behalf of Nikkei, have provided valuable timely insights into the economy's performance and help to identify anomalies in the official GDP data.
Accurately tracking economic growth
We use three recent examples to highlight the value of the Nikkei PMI for tracking Japanese economic growth:
- Back on 5th January 2018, we noted that historical comparisons suggested the PMI survey data were consistent with the economy expanding robustly in the closing quarter of 2017, suggesting upside risks to many forecasts. The latest revisions show the economy has expanded at a 2.0% annual rate in the three months to December, some four times the originally estimated pace of growth.
- Whereas GDP data registered a 0.2% contraction of the economy in the first quarter of 2018, PMI survey data indicated that the underlying health of the economy remained in good shape to suggest that the quarterly drop in GDP looked like an anomaly and would, therefore, be reversed in the second quarter. Investors that focused purely on the GDP data and bet on a renewed downturn in the economy would have subsequently been wrong-footed as GDP rose in the second quarter.
- The latest official data showed the economy growing by 0.5% in the second quarter, returning to health after the temporary drop in output signalled at the start of the year. The rise was broadly in line with the PMI survey composite output index, the average for which rose compared with the first quarter, and as anticipated inour commentary.
Over the past decade (for which PMI data for the service sector have also been available to complement the longer-running manufacturing PMI numbers), the surveys have exhibited a 73% correlation with GDP, acting with a 2-3 month lead on the official real GDP annual growth rate numbers in addition to simply being published earlier. The correlation rises to 78% in predicting nominal GDP growth rates in advance.
Slow start to third quarter
The faster updating of the monthly PMI data mean that we already have an indication of how the Japanese economy started the third quarter. The Nikkei Composite PMI Output Index dipped from 52.1 in June to 51.8 in July, representing the third-slowest rate of growth of business activity seen over the past ten months, and below the second quarter average of 52.3.
"Disclaimer: The intellectual property rights to these data provided herein are owned by or licensed to Markit Economics Limited. Any unauthorised use, including but not limited to copying, distributing, transmitting or otherwise of any data appearing is not permitted without Markit’s prior consent. Markit shall not have any liability, duty or obligation for or relating to the content or information (“data”) contained herein, any errors, inaccuracies, omissions or delays in the data, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon.
In no event shall Markit be liable for any special, incidental, or consequential damages, arising out of the use of the data. Purchasing Managers' Index™ and PMI™ are either registered trademarks of Markit Economics Limited or licensed to Markit Economics Limited. Markit is a registered trade mark of Markit Group Limited."