⭐ Start off 2025 with a powerful boost to your portfolio: January’s freshest AI-picked sharesUnlock shares

Blackstone, KKR, TPG to settle deal collusion lawsuit - source

Published 07/08/2014, 16:44
Updated 07/08/2014, 16:50
Blackstone, KKR, TPG to settle deal collusion lawsuit - source

By Greg Roumeliotis

(Reuters) - Blackstone Group LP, KKR & Co LP and TPG Capital LP have agreed to settle a U.S. lawsuit accusing them of conspiring not to outbid each other and other buyout firms on takeovers of companies, a person familiar with the matter said.

A court filing on the settlement is expected as early as Thursday, the source said, asking not to be identified because the filing has not yet been published.

The buyout firms did not admit wrongdoing as part of the settlement, the source added.

KKR disclosed its settlement in a regulatory filing early on Thursday. It did not disclose the settlement amount but described it as not material to its earnings.

"While we continue to believe that the plaintiffs' allegations are spurious, we determined that after seven years it was best for KKR and our limited partners to put an end to the distraction and expense of this litigation," KKR said in a statement.

Blackstone declined to comment while a TPG official did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The settlement makes Carlyle Group LP the sole private equity firm still facing trial among 11 firms originally accused of colluding in deals prior to the financial crisis. A Carlyle representative declined to comment.

A trial is scheduled for Nov. 3.

Last month, Silver Lake Partners LP said it agreed to pay $29.5 million (17.51 million pounds) to settle the case. This followed a $67 million settlement with Goldman Sachs Group Inc's private equity arm and a $54 million settlement with Bain Capital LLC.

The lawsuit was brought in December 2007 by shareholders of a group of companies that the private equity firms bought. Apollo Global Management LLC, Providence Equity Partners Inc, JPMorgan Chase & Co and Thomas H. Lee Partners LP later managed to get dismissed from the case.

The firms were accused of conspiring to reduce competition by following "club rules," often teaming up on buyouts and providing quid pro quos to influence each other's behaviour.

Twenty-seven buyout deals were originally part of the case. In the eight that remain, the private equity firms are accused of collusion by having agreed not to "jump" each other's bids after buyouts were announced.

The eight remaining buyouts are movie theatre chain AMC Entertainment Holdings Inc, food service firm Aramark, chipmaker Freescale Semiconductor Ltd, casino operator Caesars Entertainment Corp, hospital chain HCA Holdings Inc, pipeline operator Kinder Morgan Inc, software maker SunGard Data Systems Inc and Texas power company TXU, now called Energy Future Holdings.

© Reuters. The Blackberry sign is pictured in Waterloo

The case is Dahl et al v. Bain Capital Partners LLC et al, U.S. District Court, District of Massachusetts, No. 07-12388.

(Reporting by Greg Roumeliotis in New York; Editing by Tom Brown)

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2025 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.