On Tuesday, a judge at London’s High Court referred Craig Wright, an Australian computer scientist, who had claimed to have invented Bitcoin, to British prosecutors for alleged perjury. The judge concluded that he had “extensively and repeatedly” lied to substantiate his false claim.Wright had sought to establish himself as the original creator of Bitcoin, claiming intellectual property rights, including copyright ownership of the bitcoin white paper and initial versions of the bitcoin software.This development follows a damning ruling by London’s High Court judge, James Mellor, who found overwhelming evidence refuting Wright’s claims of being Satoshi Nakamoto, the pseudonymous creator of Bitcoin. In a March verdict, Judge Mellor concluded that Wright had misled the court extensively to bolster his false assertions. This ruling emerged from a trial initiated by the Crypto Open Patent Alliance (COPA) to shield Bitcoin developers from Wright’s legal threats grounded in his disputed authorship claims.Interestingly, Danny Knight, a Twitter user, had posted a video of Craig Wright talking about how he first read about Bitcoin in 2008.
#faketoshi slipping up here like he always does:"I remember reading about it"
Is not what you say when you wrote it….
Because he didn't#bitcoin pic.twitter.com/9meuIn6cQB— Danny (@danny_knight) June 14, 2019
High Court refers case to Crown Prosecution Service
Judge Mellor’s written ruling on Tuesday stated that he would refer the case to Britain’s Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) to consider whether Wright should be charged with perjury for lying under oath. He emphasized that if Wright’s actions did not merit such referral, it’s difficult to envision a case that would.Mellor said,I have no doubt that I should refer the relevant papers in this case to the CPS for consideration of whether a prosecution should be commenced against Dr Wright for his wholescale perjury and forgery of documents and/or whether a warrant for his arrest should be issued and/or whether his extradition should be sought from wherever he now is.
Implications for the bitcoin community
The ramifications of this legal saga are profound for the Bitcoin community, which has long debated Wright’s claims. His attempts to assert control over Bitcoin’s development by posing as Satoshi Nakamoto have sparked controversy and legal battles. The High Court’s definitive stance against Wright marks a pivotal moment in clarifying Bitcoin’s creatorship and safeguarding its decentralized nature.COPA’s successful legal intervention not only defends Bitcoin’s integrity but also highlights the importance of protecting decentralized networks from unwarranted claims and legal disputes. Many in the cryptocurrency community view COPA’s action as crucial for maintaining trust and transparency in Bitcoin’s evolution.The referral of Wright’s case to the CPS highlights the legal and ethical considerations surrounding perjury and the forgery of documents in high-profile cases. The potential consequences for Wright could include prosecution, arrest, and extradition, depending on the CPS’s assessment of the evidence.Wright’s situation serves as a reminder of the importance of truthfulness and integrity in legal proceedings. The judge’s decision to refer the case to prosecutors reinforces the principle that those who lie under oath and forge documents must be held accountable for their actions.Future of the Satoshi Nakamoto debate
While the true identity of Satoshi Nakamoto remains an enigma, Wright’s legal predicament could reshape the ongoing discourse surrounding Bitcoin’s origins. The case highlights the complexities and challenges of substantiating claims over a pseudonymous creation. As the CPS deliberates, the outcome will be closely monitored by the cryptocurrency and digital finance sectors, influencing future debates and perceptions within these communities.The Bitcoin ecosystem thrives on principles of decentralization and transparency, values that may be reinforced by the resolution of Wright’s case. As stakeholders await further developments, the scrutiny surrounding Wright’s claims serves as a stark reminder of the enduring quest for authenticity and trust in the evolving digital landscape.This article first appeared on Invezz.com
