Get 40% Off
🚨 Volatile Markets? Find Hidden Gems for Serious Outperformance
Find Stocks Now

US Supreme Court Declines To Hear Vanda Pharmaceuticals' Case Regarding Invalidation Of Patents For Its Sleep Disorder Drug, Hetlioz

Published 22/04/2024, 19:37
© Reuters.  US Supreme Court Declines To Hear Vanda Pharmaceuticals' Case Regarding Invalidation Of Patents For Its Sleep Disorder Drug, Hetlioz

Benzinga - by Vandana Singh, Benzinga Editor.

The U.S. Supreme Court has reportedly chosen not to review Vanda Pharmaceuticals Inc’s (NASDAQ:VNDA) attempt to revive patents for its sleep-disorder medication Hetlioz, which had previously been invalidated in a legal battle with generic drugmakers Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited (NYSE:TEVA) and Apotex.

Vanda had filed a lawsuit in 2018 against Teva and Apotex in Delaware, alleging patent infringement after they sought approval to manufacture generic versions of Hetlioz, Reuters noted.

The Federal Circuit, a patent-focused court, ruled against Vanda, leading to the company’s appeal to the Supreme Court, which was declined.

Also Read: Neuropsychiatric-Focused Vanda Pharmaceuticals Rejects Future Pak’s Takeover Bid Valued Up To $7.75/Share.

This decision marks the Supreme Court’s avoidance of addressing when a patent can be invalidated as “obvious,” a matter not revisited since 2007, as per the report.

Last year, a federal court granted final judgment in favor of Vanda Pharmaceuticals’ Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) case requesting records created by the FDA while reviewing Vanda’s application seeking approval of Hetlioz (tasimelteon).

Vanda’s annual revenue from Hetlioz sales surpassed $100 million in 2023.

However, the company faced setbacks in its legal battle, with U.S. District Judge Colm Connolly ruling against Vanda in 2022, declaring its patents invalid based on various factors including clinical trial results and FDA guidance.

The Federal Circuit upheld this decision in 2023, prompting Vanda’s appeal to the Supreme Court earlier this year.

Vanda argued that the Federal Circuit’s standard for obviousness deviates from Supreme Court precedents, potentially rendering many drug development advancements unpatentable, particularly impacting treatments for rare diseases.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

In response, Teva and Apotex contended that Vanda’s appeal was an attempt to extend its patent monopoly on Hetlioz, asserting that the case merely involved the application of settled obviousness law.

Price Action: VNDA shares are down 4.21% at $4.89 on the last check Monday.

Disclaimer: This content was partially produced with the help of AI tools and was reviewed and published by Benzinga editors.

Image Via Shutterstock

© 2024 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.

Read the original article on Benzinga

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.