🔮 Better than the Oracle? Our Fair Value found this +42% bagger 5 months before Buffett bought itRead More

U.S. appeals court revives Nestle child slavery lawsuit

Published 23/10/2018, 20:41
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO:  A Nestle logo is pictured on a coffee factory in Orbe
NESN
-
ADM
-

By Tina Bellon

(Reuters) - A U.S. federal appeals court on Tuesday reinstated a lawsuit by a group of former child slaves accusing the U.S. unit of Nestle SA (S:NESN), the world's largest food maker, and Cargill Co of perpetuating child slavery at Ivory Coast cocoa farms.

Judges of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Pasadena, California, said in a unanimous decision that the group could proceed with its claims despite the alleged abuses having occurred overseas.

"In sum, the allegations paint a picture of overseas slave labour that defendants perpetuated from headquarters in the United States," the court wrote.

The court did not rule on the merits of the plaintiffs' claims.

The plaintiffs, originally from Mali, are contending that the companies aided and abetted human rights violations through their active involvement in purchasing cocoa from Ivory Coast (Cote d'Ivoire).

They originally sued Nestle USA, Archer-Daniels-Midland Co (N:ADM) and Cargill Inc in 2005. Archer-Daniels-Midland was dismissed from the lawsuit in 2016, according to court records. The case has since made its way to the U.S. Supreme Court, which in 2016 rejected the companies' bid to have the lawsuit thrown out.

The companies have denied the allegations.

Nestle said in a statement on Tuesday that it had explicit policies against child labour and was working to combat the global problem. The company said it disagreed with the 9th Circuit decision and was assessing appellate options.

"Regrettably, in bringing such lawsuits, the plaintiffs' class action lawyers are targeting the very organizations trying to fight forced labour," Nestle said.

Cargill did not reply to a request for comment.

A district court in Los Angeles dismissed the lawsuit twice, most recently in March 2017. That court found that the former child slaves' claims were barred by U.S. Supreme Court decisions that have made it harder for plaintiffs to sue corporations in U.S. courts for alleged violations overseas.

According to those rulings, violations elsewhere must "touch and concern" U.S. territory "with sufficient force."

The 9th Circuit said on Monday that the plaintiffs' claims fulfilled those requirements as the alleged violations fell outside the scope of the companies' ordinary business conduct.

The former child slaves alleged that the companies provided financial and technical assistance to local farmers to guarantee the cheapest source of cocoa.

The federal appeals court said that those "kickbacks" were supported by regular inspections of Ivory Coast cocoa farms by U.S. company employees who allegedly knew of and upheld the financing arrangements.

© Reuters. FILE PHOTO:  A Nestle logo is pictured on a coffee factory in Orbe

Cote d'Ivoire is the world's leading cocoa grower. Other leading producers of cocoa include Ghana, Indonesia, Nigeria and Cameroon.

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.