June's AI-picked stock updates now live. See what's new in Tech Titans, up 28.5% year to date.Unlock Stocks

'Not Your Mother-In-Law:' PR Head Of 'China's Google' Reportedly Loses Her Job After Endorsing Brutal '996' Work Culture

Published 10/05/2024, 07:17
Updated 10/05/2024, 08:40
© Reuters.  'Not Your Mother-In-Law:' PR Head Of 'China's Google' Reportedly Loses Her Job After Endorsing Brutal '996' Work Culture
BIDU
-

Benzinga - by Ananya Gairola, Benzinga Staff Writer.

The media relations chief of web search giant Baidu Inc. (NASDAQ:BIDU), known as China’s Google, has apparently resigned due to the controversial and demanding “996” work culture in the Asian country.

What Happened: Qu Jing, the media relations chief at Baidu, stepped down Thursday after sharing videos that appeared to endorse a work culture that demands employees work from 9 a.m. to 9 p.m. six days a week, reported Bloomberg, citing people familiar with the matter. This work culture is commonly referred to as “996.”

Qu discussed keeping her phone on 24/7 and cautioned her subordinates to adhere to the same practice. In one of the clips posted on Douyin, China's version of TikTok, she says, “I'm not your mother-in-law.”

Her comments sparked a significant backlash on Chinese social media, reigniting the ongoing debate about the demanding work culture in the tech industry.

The controversy surrounding the “996” work culture has been a long-standing issue in China, particularly after the unexplained deaths of several tech employees. Despite a government crackdown on excessive work, the practice has persisted, especially during economic downturns.

Meanwhile, Qu has now apologized, stating that her views were personal and not reflective of Baidu’s stance. As of Friday, she had removed the videos, and her page only displayed the apology.

Subscribe to the Benzinga Tech Trends newsletter to get all the latest tech developments delivered to your inbox.

Why It Matters: The resignation of Baidu’s media relations chief highlights the ongoing struggle within the Chinese tech industry to address the well-being of its workforce.

In the United States, Daniel McKinnon, a former product manager at both Meta Platforms Inc. and Alphabet Inc. highlighted the differences in work-life balance between the two tech giants. He said Meta might appeal more to individuals seeking growth at the expense of stress and pressure, Google could be an excellent option for those prioritizing a healthy work-life balance.

A survey result reported in March 2024, found that many employers consider the Gen Z workforce to be toxic and the “least reliable” among all generations. This suggests that the work culture debate is not only a concern for the current workforce but also the employers.

Check out more of Benzinga’s Consumer Tech coverage by following this link.

Read Next: Elon Musk Isn’t Sure If Apple Showed Its Entire $30B R&D Prowess With New iPads: ‘Maybe They Have Some Secret Products…’

Disclaimer: This content was partially produced with the help of Benzinga Neuro and was reviewed and published by Benzinga editors.

Photo by testing on Shutterstock

© 2024 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.

Read the original article on Benzinga

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.