Cyber Monday Deal: Up to 60% off InvestingProCLAIM SALE

Taiwan arms deal enough to give China bloody nose, but no more

Published 18/12/2015, 09:31
© Reuters. File photo of crew members tugging a rope as they participate in a navy exercise in Kaohsiung

By J.R. Wu and Ben Blanchard

TAIPEI/BEIJING (Reuters) - A new U.S. arms package for Taiwan will help boost the self-ruled island's ability to inflict a bloody nose on China in the attempt of an attack, enough to make Beijing think twice before any military adventure.

But Taiwan, which is expected to vote in a new government next month less friendly to China, needs advanced weapons such as the latest fighter jets or submarine-making technology if it stands a chance of holding off a concerted Chinese assault before U.S. forces come to the rescue.

"The idea is to complicate China's scenarios, to make them pause, to get them to think twice before they attack," said Rupert Hammond-Chambers, president of the U.S.-Taiwan Business Council.

China quickly criticized this week's $1.83 billion deal, the first arms sales to Taiwan that the Obama administration has approved in four years, saying it interferes with its sovereignty over Taiwan. The deal includes two Navy frigates, combat systems for mine-sweepers, missiles, amphibious attack vehicles and communications systems.

Compared to China's ambitious build-up of its military, the world's largest, Taiwan's arms deals are aimed at survivability.

Giving its latest assessment on China's forces in September, Taiwan's defence ministry indicated Beijing could devote 400,000 of its 1.24 million-strong ground force in combat against the island. That would give it a two-to-one advantage against Taiwan's 215,000 full time troops.

Taiwan is highly vulnerable to a quick strike, experts say. Chinese fighter jets could scream across the narrow Taiwan Strait in minutes and take out Taiwan's air fields, while China rains down some of the hundreds of missiles it is believed to have targeted at the island.

Still, maintaining an updated stockpile of military equipment and munitions - like the items in this week's arms deal - is as important as having "big-ticket" items to sustain Taiwan's self defence, said Shirley Kan, a retired Congressional researcher who has tracked U.S. arms sales to Taiwan since 1990

WASHINGTON "PROTECTION PLEDGE"

On Friday, China's influential Global Times, a tabloid published by the ruling Communist Party's official People's Daily, said China would maintain its military superiority no matter what weapons the United States sold Taiwan.

"Washington's protection pledge is the only card that the island has for its defence, and it is a weakening one," it said in an editorial. "Given the mainland's steadily growing military power, once the U.S. gets involved in a conflict in the Taiwan Straits, it will face increasing costs and consequences."

Taiwan and the United States have close security ties and Washington is obligated by law to support Taiwan in defending itself.

One senior Beijing-based Western diplomat, speaking on condition of anonymity and citing conversations with Chinese strategists, said the last thing China wanted was armed confrontation with Washington.

"They can't guarantee winning, and they would face huge domestic consequences" for a botched military operation, the diplomat said.

Taiwan's independence-leaning Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), which is likely to win January's presidential and parliamentary elections, says stronger defence capabilities for the island would give Taiwan better confidence to expand exchanges with China.

Defeated Nationalist forces fled to Taiwan after losing a civil war with the Communists in 1949. Beijing has never renounced the use of force to bring what it deems a renegade province under its control.

But any Chinese attempt to forcibly occupy Taiwan would likely trigger a regional conflagration, said Hammond-Chambers of the U.S.-Taiwan Business Council.

© Reuters. File photo of crew members tugging a rope as they participate in a navy exercise in Kaohsiung

"It's almost inconceivable that a fight over Taiwan wouldn't escalate and involve U.S. and Japanese forces, maybe even Korean and Australian as well – very difficult to predict."

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.