Get 40% Off
🤯 Perficient is up a mind-blowing 53%. Our ProPicks AI saw the buying opportunity in March.Read full update

'Just A Worse Version Of Apollo:' Elon Musk Baffled By NASA Veteran's Push To Ditch SpaceX, Blue Origin And Use Existing Tech For Artemis Moon Mission

Published 19/01/2024, 11:45
© Reuters.  'Just A Worse Version Of Apollo:' Elon Musk Baffled By NASA Veteran's Push To Ditch SpaceX, Blue Origin And Use Existing Tech For Artemis Moon Mission

Benzinga - by Anan Ashraf, Benzinga Editor.

SpaceX CEO Elon Musk on Friday slammed former NASA administrator Michael Griffin‘s plans for returning to the Moon as a “worse version of Apollo.”

What Happened: “His plan makes no sense,” Musk wrote on X, formerly Twitter. “Just a worse version of Apollo.”

The CEO’s comments come on the heels of Griffin’s criticisms of the Artemis program to a House of Representatives subcommittee on Wednesday. At the hearing, Griffin called for a cancellation of existing contracts with SpaceX and Blue Origin under the Artemis program alleging that they will not succeed in landing Americans to the Moon.

The cost of the contracts to SpaceX and Blue Origin to carry out lunar landings is merely 1.5% of the Apollo program from 1960-1973, Griffin said. Terming the cost “grossly unrealistic,” Griffin alleged that the low price on the contracts proves that the United States is not serious about landing humans back on the Moon.

The former administrator also posed concerns about crew safety, high mission execution risk, unreliability, and increased complexity. “The fundamental flaw in the Artemis acquisition approach is the assumption that the U.S. government can and should leverage so-called ‘commercial space’ for national purposes, and

that this paradigm is applicable to human spaceflight,” Griffin said.

If Not Artemis? The former NASA administrator is of the opinion that early lunar return missions can be achieved using existing technology and systems and can enable the return of the U.S. to the moon starting in 2029.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

According to Griffin, a return to the Moon requires none of the complex processes being developed by commercial space companies. Instead, it only requires two SLS Block 2 heavy lift launches, each carrying a Centaur III upper stage, an Orion command and service module, and a yet-to-designed two-stage storable-propellant lunar lander.

The United States is currently expecting to send astronauts to the surface of the moon by September 2026 with the Artemis III mission. The last time humans set foot on the Moon was in 1972 with Apollo 17. Since then, no crew has traveled beyond low-Earth orbit.

Check out more of Benzinga’s Future Of Mobility coverage by following this link.

Read Next: SpaceX Plans For Equipment That Never Sleeps To Achieve Record 144 Launches This Year

Photo via Shutterstock

© 2024 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.

Read the original article on Benzinga

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.