Unlock Premium Data: Up to 50% Off InvestingProCLAIM SALE

Judge refuses to block generic versions of AstraZeneca's Crestor

Published 20/07/2016, 00:01
© Reuters. The logo of AstraZeneca is seen on medication packages in a pharmacy in London
NOVN
-
AZN
-
AGN
-
VTRS
-

By Brendan Pierson

(Reuters) - A U.S. judge on Tuesday refused to issue a temporary restraining order blocking the approval of new generic versions of AstraZeneca's (L:AZN) blockbuster cholesterol drug Crestor in the United States.

U.S. District Judge Randolph Moss in Washington, D.C. ruled that AstraZeneca was not likely to win a lawsuit claiming it should get seven more years of exclusive rights to the drug thanks to its recent approval to treat a rare pediatric illness.

Generic drugmakers including Novartis AG (S:NOVN) unit Sandoz, Apotex and Mylan (O:MYL) have said in court filings that they are prepared to launch generic versions of Crestor, which lost patent protection earlier this month.

AstraZeneca spokeswoman Michele Meixell said in an emailed statement the company was "disappointed" with the decision.

AstraZeneca's bid to extend its exclusivity had drawn sharp criticism from former presidential candidate and Senator Bernie Sanders, a Democrat from Vermont, who along with seven Democratic U.S. Representatives had urged the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in a July 7 letter not to let the company exploit a "loophole."

Allergan plc (N:AGN) has already been selling generic Crestor in the U.S. since May under a licensing agreement with AstraZeneca, and is not affected by Tuesday's order.

Crestor, which accounted for more than 20 percent of AstraZeneca's $23.6 billion in sales last year, was approved by the FDA for the treatment of high cholesterol in 2003.

In May, the FDA approved the addition of a new indication for use to the drug's label for the treatment of homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia in patients 7 to 17 years old. The rare genetic disease, which causes high cholesterol and sometimes heart disease, affects about one in a million people.

In June, AstraZeneca won seven years of exclusive marketing rights for the new indication under the federal "orphan drug" program. Orphan drug exclusivity is granted to new drugs or new indications of existing drugs for rare diseases, to encourage research that might otherwise not be profitable.

AstraZeneca then sued the FDA seeking to block final approval of any new generic Crestor. The company claimed that federal law required drugs to include all pediatric indications on their labels.

Moss's decision on Tuesday is in line with a ruling last year by another judge in the same court, who allowed generic versions of Otsuka's antipsychotic drug Abilify to go on the market even though the drug had recently been approved for a rare disease.

© Reuters. The logo of AstraZeneca is seen on medication packages in a pharmacy in London

The case is AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP et al v. Burwell et al, U.S. District Court, District of Columbia, No. 1:16-cv-01336.

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.