Get 40% Off
👀 👁 🧿 All eyes on Biogen, up +4,56% after posting earnings. Our AI picked it in March 2024.
Which stocks will surge next?
Unlock AI-picked Stocks

Hedge fund bet on Glencore backfires with $100 million loss

Published 17/11/2017, 15:21
Updated 17/11/2017, 15:30
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO - UK hedge fund Lansdowne Partners Chairman Stuart Roden poses for a photograph before the Sohn Conference in Tel Aviv

By Maiya Keidan and Barbara Lewis

LONDON (Reuters) - London hedge fund giant Lansdowne Partners lost $100 million (£75.7 million) from a long-term bet against Glencore (L:GLEN) this year after the spectacular recovery of the miner took some by surprise.

For Lansdowne, that bet had generated returns in 2014 and 2015, when Glencore more than other major miners was dragged down by falling commodity prices and concerns about its level of debt.

But so far this year, Glencore's shares have risen 29 percent, from 278 to 354 pence, making it the top-performing global miner.

Filings with British regulator the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) showed Lansdowne was borrowing more than 0.5 percent of the stock on the expectation the price would fall - a tactic called "shorting" - between July 2014 and August 2017.

During 2017, Lansdowne's shorts in Glencore cost it 76.23 million pounds, Thomson Reuters Eikon data showed.

A spokesman at Lansdowne declined to comment on why the hedge fund continued to hold a short throughout 2016 and 2017, during which time investors regained faith in Glencore from its decisive action in late 2015 to restructure its debt and the sale of some assets.

"A lot of people were really against Glencore (in 2014/2015)," said David Neuhauser, founder and managing director at Livermore Partners, which invested $2.6 million in the stock in September 2015 when the shares fell to 70 pence each and generated returns of $3.12 million to date.

"People were extremely bearish and extremely confident that they had been right on the way down."

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

Back in 2015, large hedge funds Viking Global Investors, Passport Capital and Discovery Capital had joined in the short, riding a 2015 fall in Glencore's value from 278.9 pence a share to 89.8 pence per share.

All had largely bailed out of the trade by July 2016, FCA data showed, avoiding a 68.1 percent bounce back in Glencore stock that year. That left Lansdowne the only fund with a short position above a 0.5 percent disclosure threshold in 2017.

Spokespeople at Viking, Passport and Discovery declined to comment when contacted by Reuters.

Total short positions in Glencore stock in 2017 remained far below 2016 levels, data from industry tracker FIS' Astec Analytics showed, with just 2 percent of the stock available to be lent on loan at Nov. 15, from a high of 20 percent in 2016.

But Glencore's debt is still high relative to some peers and the company has a history of making debt-fuelled acquisitions.

It is also the world’s biggest shipper of seaborne thermal coal, which many countries are trying to replace with greener fuels for electricity generation, and has a major presence in countries with a high degree of political risk.

A majority of analysts rate Glencore a buy, but analysts at Liberum boutique investment bank have downgraded the stock to sell from hold.

They still rate it the “top pick in the majors” as it has minimal exposure to iron ore and coking coal, vulnerable to the knock-on effects of an oversupplied steel sector.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

In a note announcing the downgrade, Liberum cited “the increasing risk of negative earnings momentum in the months ahead on falling copper and coal prices”.

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.