Breaking News
Get 40% Off 0
👀 Reveal Warren Buffett's stock picks that are beating the S&P 500 by +174.3% Get 40% Off

Finnish grid and nuclear plant in dispute over power backup

Published Oct 05, 2023 10:21
Saved. See Saved Items.
This article has already been saved in your Saved Items
 
© Reuters.
 
FORTUM
-0.39%
Add to/Remove from a Portfolio
Add to Watchlist
Add Position

Position added successfully to:

Please name your holdings portfolio
 
OUT1V
-0.37%
Add to/Remove from a Portfolio
Add to Watchlist
Add Position

Position added successfully to:

Please name your holdings portfolio
 
UPM
-0.23%
Add to/Remove from a Portfolio
Add to Watchlist
Add Position

Position added successfully to:

Please name your holdings portfolio
 
STERV
+0.21%
Add to/Remove from a Portfolio
Add to Watchlist
Add Position

Position added successfully to:

Please name your holdings portfolio
 
KCRA
+0.92%
Add to/Remove from a Portfolio
Add to Watchlist
Add Position

Position added successfully to:

Please name your holdings portfolio
 
EUR/USD
+0.15%
Add to/Remove from a Portfolio
Add to Watchlist
Add Position

Position added successfully to:

Please name your holdings portfolio
 

By Anne Kauranen

HELSINKI (Reuters) - Finland's energy authority says it will rule "as soon as possible" on a dispute between the owners of Europe's largest nuclear reactor and national grid operator Fingrid over the cost of power backup for the 1.6 gigawatt (GW) reactor.

Finland's Olkiluoto 3 (OL3) nuclear reactor started regular power production in April after 18 years of construction and testing, and years of legal battles over costs and delays.

Now the owners - the TVO consortium that includes utility Fortum, chemicals producer Kemira, and forestry groups UPM and Stora Enso among others - have accused Fingrid of setting "unfounded restrictions" on OL3's power generation, the energy authority said.

In an official complaint, TVO is asking for an investigation into whether Fingrid has neglected its obligations to develop the grid, the authority said, adding it would rule on the matter "as soon as possible".

Whenever OL3's production exceeds 1.3 GW, Fingrid requires TVO to keep sufficient power backup capacity instantly available in case of a technical failure that could otherwise black out the national grid.

TVO's owners are big industrial power consumers that lower their own production to provide the system backup but are unable to do so, for example, during maintenance shutdowns, TVO said.

"During the past months, OL3's output has often been reduced because the backup capacity has not been fully available," TVO's head of communications Johanna Aho told Reuters.

TVO wants a different kind of backup system "to match today's needs", she added.

Fingrid says it represents the public interest and power end-users who would eventually pay the bill for new investments in national power backup capacity.

"This discussion is all about money," Fingrid's Chief Executive Jukka Ruusunen told Reuters.

The existing backup arrangement was made 20 years ago when planning for OL3 construction began and reserve capacity had little financial value. Now TVO's reserves are worth 100 million euros annually in the reserve markets, he said.

"Now they have come up with an idea that Fingrid should build a new kind of protection at the expense of power users," Ruusunen said.

OL3 accounts for around 14% of Finland's overall power demand.

Finnish grid and nuclear plant in dispute over power backup
 

Related Articles

Add a Comment

Comment Guidelines

We encourage you to use comments to engage with users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind: 

  • Enrich the conversation
  • Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed.
  • Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically.
  •  Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases.
  • NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and links within a comment will be removed
  • Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user.
  • Don’t Monopolize the Conversation. We appreciate passion and conviction, but we also believe strongly in giving everyone a chance to air their thoughts. Therefore, in addition to civil interaction, we expect commenters to offer their opinions succinctly and thoughtfully, but not so repeatedly that others are annoyed or offended. If we receive complaints about individuals who take over a thread or forum, we reserve the right to ban them from the site, without recourse.
  • Only English comments will be allowed.

Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.

Write your thoughts here
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
Post also to:
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Thanks for your comment. Please note that all comments are pending until approved by our moderators. It may therefore take some time before it appears on our website.
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Add Chart to Comment
Confirm Block

Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?

By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's Investing.com's posts.

%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List

Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.

Report this comment

I feel that this comment is:

Comment flagged

Thank You!

Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Continue with Google
or
Sign up with Email