Get 40% Off
👀 👁 🧿 All eyes on Biogen, up +4,56% after posting earnings. Our AI picked it in March 2024.
Which stocks will surge next?
Unlock AI-picked Stocks

Ex-Google exec testifies about search engine giant’s tactics 

Published 14/09/2023, 10:03
Updated 14/09/2023, 10:10
© Reuters.  Ex-Google exec testifies about search engine giant’s tactics 

Proactive Investors - A former Google (NASDAQ:GOOGL) executive has testified that the search engine giant hired staff to win positions as a default search engine with mobile phone companies.

Chris Barton, who was hired by Google in April 2004 to form strategic partnerships with mobile phone network carriers such as Verizon Communications Inc. (NYSE:VZ) and AT&T Inc. (NYSE:T), gave testimony in a district court on the second day of a landmark antitrust case yesterday.

He said staff were hired into his department to aggressively secure exclusivity for Google as a default search engine on smartphones and other mobile devices.

When questioned by prosecutors from the U.S. Department of Justice, Barton said that the new hires would negotiate agreements to ensure Google was the main default search engine provider for mobile phone operators and manufacturers.

Barton, who worked for Google until January 2010, testified that he persuaded companies to choose Google by saying they would generate advertising revenue from user clicks.

“I faced a challenge because mobile carriers became fixed on revenue share percentage,” Barton said in court, who according to his LinkedIn profile formed partnerships with the world’s largest mobile carriers that drove “hundreds of millions in revenue”.

This aggressive tactic was used as Google’s rival browser Bing was rolled out on Microsoft Corporation (NASDAQ:MSFT) devices. Barton said he worried that smartphone users would find it “difficult” to install Google if Bing was the default.

Emails between Google executives from 2011 show that around that time AT&T had opted for Yahoo and Verizon chose Bing as their default search engines.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

Google’s chief economist Hal Varian was meanwhile questioned about how Google utilises user data generated by clicks to adapt future searches.

Antonio Rangel, a behavioural economist at the California Institute of Technology, testified for the government arguing that Google defaults discouraged users from switching to other search engines. While Google defence lawyer John Schmidtlein said on the opening day of the trial on Tuesday that it took four clicks or “taps” to change browsers if Google was installed as the default search engine, Rangel argued that it took him ten steps to switch browser.

Google has dominated the search engine market, growing to occupy a more than 90% share.

In the opening remarks for the trial on Tuesday, federal prosecutors said that the search engine operator paid over US$10 billion a year in payments to secure itself as the main search engine for companies like Apple Inc (NASDAQ:AAPL) and Samsung Electronics (LON:0593xq) and browser operators such as Mozilla.

District Judge Amit Mehta is expected to issue a ruling early next year on the antitrust trial, which is expected to last for ten weeks.

Read more on Proactive Investors UK

Disclaimer

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.