NVDA gained a massive 197% since our AI first added it in November - is it time to sell? 🤔Read more

Exclusive: Pfizer negotiating 2-3 percent Allergan break-up fee - sources

Published 19/11/2015, 22:56
© Reuters. The Pfizer logo is pictured at their building in the Manhattan borough of New York
C
-
T
-
VOD
-
SHP
-
AGN
-
PFE
-
VZ
-
TMUS
-
ABBV
-

By Greg Roumeliotis and Pamela Barbaglia

(Reuters) - Pfizer Inc (N:PFE) is negotiating a 2-3 percent break-up fee with Allergan Plc (N:AGN) that would be in line with most deals, people familiar with the matter said, a sign of confidence that such a merger could overcome regulatory hurdles. The break-up fee, to be paid by Pfizer if it were to walk away from Allergan, would come out to $3 billion (£1.96 billion) to $4.5 billion based on a $150 billion deal value. That would make it one of the highest ever break-up fees in dollar terms. However, break-up fees are set in relation to the target company's size. One of the people familiar said a 2-3 percent fee would be at the lower end of similar transactions. One of the main regulatory concerns about a Pfizer-Allergan merger pertains to the domicile of the combined company. U.S.-based Pfizer could move its headquarters to Ireland, where Allergan is based, to take advantage of lower tax rates. So-called tax inversions have driven other merger deals, but the U.S. Treasury is planning to clamp down on them.

When the Treasury last tightened the rules on inversions in 2014, Chicago-based drugmaker AbbVie Inc (N:ABBV) paid a break-up fee of close to $1.7 billion to peer Shire Plc (L:SHP) to abandon its $55 billion merger agreement that would have seen it re-domicile in Ireland.

The largest beak-up fee ever agreed was $10 billion, and involved Verizon Communications Inc's (N:VZ) $130 billion deal in 2013 to acquire Vodafone Group Plc's (L:VOD) 45 percent stake in Verizon Wireless.

The biggest break-up fee that has been paid was for $4 billion, when AT&T Inc's (N:T) $39 billion deal to acquire T-Mobile US Inc (O:TMUS) was opposed by regulators in 2011.

The sources, who asked not to be identified because the negotiations are confidential, cautioned that the break-up fee and other aspects of Pfizer's deal with Allergan have not been finalised, and that the companies were still waiting for the Treasury to unveil its updated rules on inversions.

Pfizer and Allergan both declined to comment.

Pfizer is negotiating $370 to $380 for each Allergan share, a person familiar with the discussions said on Wednesday. Allergan shares closed at $302.05, down 2.8 percent, illustrating that investors are still worried about the deal's prospects. Pfizer shares ended down 3 percent at $32.29.

"We struggle to see what the Treasury can do to specifically curb a Pfizer-Allergan combination, however, we also acknowledge that the political noise surrounding the re-domicile of Pfizer - one of the largest pharma companies in the U.S. - will likely only increase with the announcement of a merger, and likely constitutes the most material hurdle to consummation of transaction of this nature," Citigroup (N:C) analysts wrote in a note on Wednesday.

As a wave of inversions peaked in September 2014, Treasury took several regulatory actions to reduce the tax benefits of inverting, while also making new deals more difficult. That slowed deal flow but did not stop it entirely.

For months tax experts have speculated about what could come next from Treasury. Possible steps might include tightening the rules on two strategies related to inversions, tax experts said: so-called "earnings stripping" and "skinny down" distributions.

Earnings-stripping rules combat shifting of U.S. profits out of the country to low-tax jurisdictions. Treasury has struggled to write new rules on this under present law, said tax experts.

© Reuters. The Pfizer logo is pictured at their building in the Manhattan borough of New York

Rules targeting skinny-down distributions are meant to keep U.S. companies from shrinking their operations ahead of inversions to evade standards for minimum levels of foreign ownership in inverted companies.

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.