Get 40% Off
👀 👁 🧿 All eyes on Biogen, up +4,56% after posting earnings. Our AI picked it in March 2024.
Which stocks will surge next?
Unlock AI-picked Stocks

Crucial Battle Over Healthcare Mandates: Biden Administration Defends Preventive Care Coverage Amidst Legal Challenges

Published 04/03/2024, 16:39
Updated 04/03/2024, 17:40
© Reuters.  Crucial Battle Over Healthcare Mandates: Biden Administration Defends Preventive Care Coverage Amidst Legal Challenges

Benzinga - by Vandana Singh, Benzinga Editor.

The Biden administration is working to preserve a crucial federal mandate compelling health insurers to cover preventive care services, including HIV-preventing medication and cancer screenings, without additional costs to patients.

This mandate is integral to the 2010 Affordable Care Act (ACA). But it faces challenges from a group of businesses led by Texas-based Christian wellness center operator Braidwood Management, which vehemently opposes mandatory coverage for HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP).

Scheduled before a three-judge panel of the New Orleans-based 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, the arguments revolve around the lawsuit brought by Braidwood, and others centered on the belief that providing coverage for PrEP infringes upon their religious convictions by ostensibly promoting homosexuality and drug use.

PrEP drugs, crucial for preventing HIV infection, are developed by pharmaceutical giants like Gilead Sciences Inc (NASDAQ:GILD) and ViiV Healthcare — a joint venture of GSK Plc (NYSE:GSK), Pfizer Inc (NYSE:PFE), and Shionogi.

This legal dispute traces back to U.S. District Judge Reed O’Connor’s decision in March 2023, where he blocked the mandate and raised concerns about the task force’s authority in selecting covered services.

O’Connor argued that this power extended beyond what the U.S. Constitution allowed for officials not appointed by the president and confirmed by the Senate.

While O’Connor’s ruling is temporarily on hold due to an agreement between Braidwood and the Biden administration during the appeal process, if implemented, it could allow insurers to impose co-pays and deductibles for preventive services.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

However, O’Connor’s ruling notably excludes services recommended by the task force before the ACA’s enactment in 2010, Reuters noted.

The three-judge panel overseeing this appeal includes Circuit Judges Don Willett and Cory Wilson, appointed by Republican former President Donald Trump, and Circuit Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez, appointed by current Democratic President Joe Biden.

O’Connor’s previous involvement in a 2018 case, where he struck down the entire Obamacare, underscores the significance of this ongoing legal battle, which remains a focal point in shaping the future of healthcare coverage in the United States.

Disclaimer: This content was partially produced with the help of AI tools and was reviewed and published by Benzinga editors.

Now Read: Overdose Crisis Worsens: The Rise Of Fentanyl Smoking Leads To Even More Deaths Than Shooting Heroin

© 2024 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.

Read the original article on Benzinga

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.