Get 40% Off
🚀 AI-picked stocks soar in May. PRFT is +55%—in just 16 days! Don’t miss June’s top picks.Unlock full list

Competitor Analysis: Evaluating Microsoft And Competitors In Software Industry

Published 29/04/2024, 16:00
© Reuters.  Competitor Analysis: Evaluating Microsoft And Competitors In Software Industry
MSFT
-

Benzinga - by Benzinga Insights, Benzinga Staff Writer.

Amidst today's fast-paced and highly competitive business environment, it is crucial for investors and industry enthusiasts to conduct comprehensive company evaluations. In this article, we will delve into an extensive industry comparison, evaluating Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT) in comparison to its major competitors within the Software industry. By analyzing critical financial metrics, market position, and growth potential, our objective is to provide valuable insights for investors and offer a deeper understanding of company's performance in the industry.

Microsoft Background Microsoft develops and licenses consumer and enterprise software. It is known for its Windows operating systems and Office productivity suite. The company is organized into three equally sized broad segments: productivity and business processes (legacy Microsoft Office, cloud-based Office 365, Exchange, SharePoint, Skype, LinkedIn, Dynamics), intelligence cloud (infrastructure- and platform-as-a-service offerings Azure, Windows Server OS, SQL Server), and more personal computing (Windows Client, Xbox, Bing search, display advertising, and Surface laptops, tablets, and desktops).

CompanyP/EP/BP/SROEEBITDA (in billions)Gross Profit (in billions)Revenue Growth
Microsoft Corp 35.21 11.93 12.82 8.93% $33.55 $43.35 17.03%
Oracle Corp 30.93 57.29 6.28 50.61% $5.3 $9.41 7.11%
ServiceNow Inc 77.30 18.33 15.77 4.41% $0.46 $2.08 6.81%
Palo Alto Networks Inc 45.11 21.61 13.61 53.52% $0.21 $1.48 19.33%
CrowdStrike Holdings Inc 821.81 31.92 24.25 2.48% $0.12 $0.64 32.63%
Gen Digital Inc 9.33 5.43 3.50 5.96% $0.47 $0.77 1.6%
Dolby Laboratories Inc 41.25 3.23 6.05 2.85% $0.09 $0.28 -5.78%
Qualys Inc 42.27 17.10 11.55 11.75% $0.05 $0.12 10.49%
Teradata Corp 61.75 27.26 2.10 -5.45% $0.06 $0.28 1.11%
N-able Inc 95.38 3.22 5.47 1.35% $0.03 $0.09 13.22%
Progress Software Corp 32.48 4.71 3.15 4.91% $0.06 $0.15 12.46%
Average 125.76 19.01 9.17 13.24% $0.68 $1.53 9.9%
table { width: 100%; border-collapse: collapse; font-family: Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; }

th, td { padding: 8px; text-align: left; }

th { background-color: #293a5a; color: #fff; text-align: left; }

tr:nth-child(even) { background-color: #f2f4f8; }

tr:hover { background-color: #e1e4ea; }

td:nth-child(3), td:nth-child(5) { text-align: left; }

.dividend-amount { font-weight: bold; color: #0d6efd; }

.dividend-frequency { font-size: 12px; color: #6c757d; } By carefully studying Microsoft, we can deduce the following trends:

  • With a Price to Earnings ratio of 35.21, which is 0.28x less than the industry average, the stock shows potential for growth at a reasonable price, making it an interesting consideration for market participants.

  • With a Price to Book ratio of 11.93, significantly falling below the industry average by 0.63x, it suggests undervaluation and the possibility of untapped growth prospects.

  • The Price to Sales ratio of 12.82, which is 1.4x the industry average, suggests the stock could potentially be overvalued in relation to its sales performance compared to its peers.

  • The company has a lower Return on Equity (ROE) of 8.93%, which is 4.31% below the industry average. This indicates potential inefficiency in utilizing equity to generate profits, which could be attributed to various factors.

  • Compared to its industry, the company has higher Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA) of $33.55 Billion, which is 49.34x above the industry average, indicating stronger profitability and robust cash flow generation.

  • Compared to its industry, the company has higher gross profit of $43.35 Billion, which indicates 28.33x above the industry average, indicating stronger profitability and higher earnings from its core operations.

  • The company's revenue growth of 17.03% is notably higher compared to the industry average of 9.9%, showcasing exceptional sales performance and strong demand for its products or services.

Debt To Equity Ratio

The debt-to-equity (D/E) ratio gauges the extent to which a company has financed its operations through debt relative to equity.

Considering the debt-to-equity ratio in industry comparisons allows for a concise evaluation of a company's financial health and risk profile, aiding in informed decision-making.

By evaluating Microsoft against its top 4 peers in terms of the Debt-to-Equity ratio, the following observations arise:

  • Compared to its top 4 peers, Microsoft has a stronger financial position indicated by its lower debt-to-equity ratio of 0.32.

  • This suggests that the company relies less on debt financing and has a more favorable balance between debt and equity, which can be seen as a positive attribute by investors.

Key Takeaways For Microsoft in the Software industry, the PE and PB ratios are low compared to peers, indicating potential undervaluation. However, the high PS ratio suggests investors are willing to pay a premium for revenue. The low ROE may indicate lower profitability compared to peers, while the high EBITDA and gross profit suggest strong operational performance. Additionally, the high revenue growth implies a positive outlook for future earnings potential.

This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

© 2024 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.

Read the original article on Benzinga

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.