Get 40% Off
🚨 Volatile Markets? Find Hidden Gems for Serious Outperformance
Find Stocks Now

Victim could have survived UK bomb attack but for flawed response, inquiry says

Published 03/11/2022, 16:19
Updated 03/11/2022, 16:21
© Reuters. Candles burn with the names of the dead during the first anniversary of the Manchester Arena bombing, in Manchester, Britain, May 22, 2018. REUTERS/Andrew Yates/File Photo

By Michael Holden

LONDON (Reuters) - One of those killed in a suicide bomb attack at a concert in the English city of Manchester in 2017 would probably have survived if the response by the emergency services had not been so flawed, an inquiry concluded on Thursday.

Twenty-two people - the youngest aged just eight - died in the attack and more than 200 were injured when a man detonated a bomb at Manchester Arena as parents arrived to collect their children at the end of a concert by U.S. singer Ariana Grande.

In a damning report, inquiry chairman John Saunders said while there had been individual acts of courage to help the victims, "many things did go badly wrong".

"Those who have listened to the evidence will not be surprised that I am highly critical of many aspects of the rescue operation," he said, adding that there had been significant failings by a number of organisations.

In his report, Saunders concluded that one victim, John Atkinson, 28, who had received tickets to go the concert as a Christmas present, could have survived his serious injuries had he received prompt medical treatment.

Like the others caught up in the blast, Atkinson was carried out of the venue on advertising hoardings and railings used as makeshift stretchers, while there was a shortage of ambulances to take the injured to hospital.

"It is now clear beyond any doubt that on the night of the bombing John was totally failed at every stage," his family said in a statement.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

Saunders said one of the most upsetting parts of the inquiry was hearing from rescuers and the injured "who heard the sirens of the ambulances outside and expected to see paramedics arriving imminently, and then hearing of their despair when so many fewer than they reasonably expected actually arrived".

While the evidence was conclusive that 20 victims would have died of their injuries, Saunders said there was a remote possibility that the youngest to die, Saffie-Rose Roussos, might have survived if the rescue operation had been handled differently.

The inquiry heard harrowing accounts of how she too was taken out on a makeshift stretcher, at one stage asking a paramedic: "Am I going to die?" Her father Andrew had told the inquiry the response had been "shameful and inadequate".

Kim Harrison, from law firm Slater and Gordon which represented 12 families, said the report had confirmed their fears about the "catastrophic failings of the emergency services" and that the system needed a complete overhaul.

Interior minister Suella Braverman said she would carefully consider the many recommendations made by Saunders.

"Without doubt, our emergency services show incredible courage when responding to incidents of this magnitude," she said on Twitter.

Saunders' report is the second of three examining the May 22 bombing. The first looked at failings in security at the venue itself, while the third will examine whether the police and intelligence agencies could have done more to have prevented it.

The attack, the deadliest in Britain since the 2005 London transport suicide bombings, was carried out by Salman Abedi, 22, while his younger brother Hashem was jailed for 55 years in 2020 for encouraging and helping him.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

A third elder brother, Ismail, was in July convicted in his absence of failing to attend the inquiry to give evidence, having fled Britain. The Abedi brothers were born to Libyan parents who emigrated to Britain during the rule of Muammar Gaddafi.

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.