Get 40% Off
🚨 Volatile Markets? Find Hidden Gems for Serious Outperformance
Find Stocks Now

New York says Barclays move to toss fraud case should be denied

Published 17/09/2014, 01:27
© Reuters A worker walks between public hire bikes, sponsored by Barclays, in the city of London

By Herbert Lash

NEW YORK (Reuters) - The New York attorney general on Tuesday rebutted Barclays Plc's motion to dismiss the state's lawsuit alleging fraud in how it ran a private trading platform, calling the arguments in the petition "misguided" and "disingenuous."

New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman again blasted Barclays for allegedly not protecting customers from "high-frequency" traders in its trading venue, despite repeated assurances to clients by the bank that it was doing so.

Schneiderman moved to knock down a key argument in Barclays' motion, that the lawsuit falls outside of the scope and authority of the New York's securities laws, a powerful statue known as the Martin Act.

Schneiderman said the 1921 statue has long co-existed with federal securities regulation and enforcement, and he said that the suggestion in Barclays' motion that federal law should take precedence in matters of securities fraud is misguided.

A spokesman for Barclays said the bank will continue to cooperate with the attorney general, but the complaint is based on clear and substantial factual errors.

"We do not believe that this suit is justified, and we have a duty to our shareholders, clients and colleagues to defend our position," said the spokesman, Mark Lane.

The attorney general also took issue with Barclays' assertion that customers trading in its "dark pool" trading platform were never misled as they were sophisticated investors.

"Conduct that deceives even sophisticated investors is hardly excluded from oversight and enforcement," Schneiderman said.

The complaint, filed in June, alleged that Barclays promised to ensure the best possible price for orders but instead took steps that maximized the bank's profits.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

Nearly all trades were executed on its dark pool called LX when better prices might have been obtained if Barclays had sent trades to other stock exchanges or venues, the complaint said.

The lawsuit is the highest profile case yet as U.S. authorities move to make trading more transparent as more and more trades are executed on dark pools and other alternative trading systems where prices are not immediately posted.

Schneiderman repeated previous allegations that representations made by Barclays about its dark pool were false, such as the protections it offered against aggressive high-frequency trading and how it routed client orders.

"Barclays' false assurances are manifested in the theme set forth in its marketing material: 'Protecting clients in the dark,'" the attorney general said.

Barclays has until Oct. 12 to respond, after which the case will go to trial if a settlement isn't reached.

(Reporting by Herbert Lash; Editing by Chris Reese, Steve Orlofsky and Bernard Orr)

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.