Cyber Monday Deal: Up to 60% off InvestingProCLAIM SALE

UBS in $33 million deal with U.S. regulator over mortgage bonds

Published 25/02/2016, 22:22
© Reuters. The company's logo is seen at a branch of Swiss bank UBS in Zurich
UBSG
-

By Nate Raymond

NEW YORK (Reuters) - UBS AG (VX:UBSG) has agreed to pay $33 million (£23.6 million) to resolve a U.S. regulator's claims that it sold toxic mortgage-backed securities to credit unions that later failed, according to court papers filed on Thursday.

The deal, disclosed in a filing in Manhattan federal court, resolves one of several lawsuits by the National Credit Union Administration against banks over their sale of mortgage-backed securities before the 2008 financial crisis.

The deal boosts to nearly $2.46 billion the amount the NCUA has recovered from banks through lawsuits it began filing in 2011, according to statistics previously provided by the U.S. regulator.

UBS declined to comment. The court filing, which described an offer of judgement in the case, said it would not have any effect on a separate but similar lawsuit by the NCUA against UBS pending in Kansas.

The lawsuit subject to the deal centred on mortgage-backed securities underwritten and sold by UBS that Southwest Corporate Federal Credit Union and Members United Corporate Federal Credit Union bought for nearly $432.4 million from 2006 to 2007.

The NCUA, which filed the lawsuit in 2013 on behalf of the failed credit unions, alleged that the securities' offering documents contained untrue statements that the loans were originated in accordance with underwriting guidelines.

The lawsuit said that in fact, the originators of the loans' originators had "systemically abandoned the stated underwriting guidelines" described in the offering documents.

The NCUA said those untrue statements made the securities riskier than represented and contributed to the credit unions' suffering "significant losses."

© Reuters. The company's logo is seen at a branch of Swiss bank UBS in Zurich

The case is National Credit Union Administration Board v. UBS Securities LLC, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 13-6731.

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.