Cyber Monday Deal: Up to 60% off InvestingProCLAIM SALE

U.S. watchdog backs Bezos' protest over key Pentagon launch programme

Published 19/11/2019, 02:00
U.S. watchdog backs Bezos' protest over key Pentagon launch programme
BA
-
MSFT
-
AMZN
-
NOC
-
LMT
-

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A U.S. watchdog on Monday backed a protest from Jeff Bezos' space company that challenged the Pentagon's military space launch procurement strategy, showing support for one of the Amazon billionaire' s disputes with major agency procurement programs.

The Government Accountability Office (GAO) sustained part of a bid protest from Blue Origin that argued the Air Force's decision to pick just two of four competing rocket companies to launch the country's next lineup of defence satellites for the next five years is "flawed".

Bezos' Amazon.com Inc (O:AMZN) also challenged the Pentagon's recent decision to award a $10 billion cloud computing contract to Microsoft Corp (O:MSFT), claiming politics spoiled a fair contracting process.

Blue Origin, founded by Bezos in 2000, filed its protest in August, claiming the Air Force programme "contains a number of flaws preventing offerers from intelligently preparing their proposals" and "squashes nascent competition by locking out non-selected providers for over 5 years."

The total contract value for the programme, called Launch Services Procurement (LSP) Phase 2, is unknown but is expected to be worth billions of dollars, assigning the Pentagon's next 34 launches of defence satellites from 2022 to 2027 to two companies.

The GAO said Monday the Air Force program's "basis for award is inconsistent with applicable procurement law and regulation" and recommended the agency change the rules of its solicitation.

If the Air Force disagrees with the GAO's recommendation, it would be the first time an agency did so since 2015, setting the stage for the U.S. Congress to intervene. Of the nearly 2,000 protest affirmations from the GAO since 2015, only one agency formally declined to implement GAO's recommendations.

The Air Force has said it "does not plan to revise the terms of the LSP solicitation due to this protest," believing its current approach is best for national security and open competition.

Congress in 2014 moved to wean the U.S. off its dependency on rockets using Russia's RD-180 engine for military launches before 2022 by initiating the Air Force LSP, which expects to pick the two award winners by the end of 2020.

United Launch Alliance (ULA), a joint venture between Boeing Co (N:BA) and Lockheed Martin Corp (N:LMT) whose Atlas 5 rocket uses the RD-180, has long dominated the military launch market, lofting the bulk of U.S. defence satellites to space since its formation in 2006.

Elon Musk's SpaceX sued the government in 2014 over a multi-billion dollar ULA deal with the Air Force for 36 launches. SpaceX dropped the lawsuit after the Air Force agreed to open up competition.

Northrop Grumman Corp (N:NOC), SpaceX and ULA have also submitted rocket proposals to the Air Force which is expected to make a final decision by the end of 2020.

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.