🥇 First rule of investing? Know when to save! Up to 55% off InvestingPro before BLACK FRIDAYCLAIM SALE

Energy & Precious Metals - Weekly Review and Calendar Ahead

Published 19/01/2020, 12:27
© Reuters.
XAU/USD
-
GC
-
LCO
-
CL
-
NG
-
PA
-
ZS
-
ZC
-
XPD/USD
-

By Barani Krishnan

By Barani Krishnan

Investing.com - It finally got done. And we’re back to arguing what good it can do, now that it’s done.

I’m talking, of course, about the $200 billion U.S.-China deal signed at the White House this week, the so-called phase one agreement that will attempt to end the mother-of-all trade wars - even as there are calls for a phase two to start from where the phase one will end.

The two-year long interim deal - which, interestingly, is proportionate to the duration of the trade war between the Trump and Xi governments - has been turned inside out since it was inked Wednesday. And the first holes have been poked by reviewers at China’s commitment to buy $52 billion of U.S. crude oil and other energy products. Negative speculation over the deal was enough to send West Texas Intermediate, the benchmark for U.S. crude, down almost 1% on the week as it settled Friday at $58.54 per barrel. Brent, the global benchmark for crude, rose a modest 0.2% to settle at $64.85.

Further weighing on crude prices Friday was the weekly oil rig count published by industry firm Baker Hughes, which showed drillers adding 14 rigs to bring to 673 the total number across U.S. oil fields. A higher rig count, in the simplest sense, means higher crude production. Over the past two weeks, the rig count had fallen, extending last year’s drop of 208.

On the precious metals front, gold, benefited from the negative media swirl over the phase one as the safe-haven continued to seek a hedge to potential troubles in the deal. But more than gold, it was palladium that rocked precious metals this week as the auto-catalyst shot to a new all-time high above $2,500 an ounce - up 28% within just two weeks after a 55% gain throughout 2019. More in the precious metals review section below.

Energy Review

From the energy aspect of the phase one alone, there were as many arguments on whether the audacious demands made by Trump on China were plausible, as there were concerns about the impact that Beijing’s assumed compliance will have on global commerce.

With both sides retaining much of the tariffs imposed on each other over the past two years - Trump for leverage against Beijing and Xi to ensure no loss of “face” for the Chinese - analysts were unsure of how the step-up in trade could occur.

“The consensus expectation is that if the deal is respected, China’s crude oil imports from the US will rise to at least 500,000 barrels per day from zero in last October,” said Olivier Jakob, founder of Petromatrix, an oil risk consultancy in Zug, Switzerland. “However, at this stage, it is difficult to see how China would do this with its current import tariffs; something must change there,” Jakob added.

He also said that if China were to increase its U.S. energy consumption to fulfill the deal, the United States would account for almost all of Chinese oil import growth in the next 12 months, “to the detriment of OPEC+ and the North Sea”. OPEC+ groups the Saudi-led Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries with non-OPEC members like Russia. The North Sea is the production hub for Brent.

Jakob’s perspective was shared by Refinitiv oil columnist Clyde Russell, who went a step further in questioning the impact that such Chinese compliance would have on the global oil trade.

“The problem for energy markets isn't whether China can actually buy the amount of crude oil, coal and liquefied natural gas it has apparently committed to under the trade truce with the United States,” Russell wrote in a Jan. 16 commentary. “The real issue is what happens if Beijing tries and succeeds?”

Russell explained that as part of the agreement, China agreed to buy at least $52.4 billion in additional energy purchases over the next two years, from a baseline of $9.1 billion in 2017. That will be broken into $18.5 billion in 2020 and $33.9 billion in 2021.

The best-ever month for China's imports from the United States was June 2018, when 14 million barrels arrived, according to Refinitiv data.

If that record performance is annualized, Russell said it would mean that China would buy about 170 million barrels, worth some $9.82 billion based on the Jan. 16 price of $57.81 for a barrel for WTI.

“For China to reach the 2020 target of $27.6 billion in energy imports from the United States, it would take more than a doubling of the record months achieved in the past,” Russell noted. “It also remains to be seen how China's existing suppliers would react to losing market share in the world's top crude importer: Would they simply roll over, or, more likely, try to protect their market share while going after U.S. customers outside of China?”

China’s biggest oil suppliers have historically been from the Middle East, led by Saudi Arabia, which is the third largest crude producer after the United States and Russia.

Energy aside, there were also questions about the agricultural portion of the deal, worth $32 billion. Netherlands-based Rabobank estimated that Chinese imports of U.S. soybeans and corn — often the only farm products talked about by the media during the trade war — would account for just about half or more of the deal.

China would have to buy a lot more of food and farm products -- including meat, seafood, dairy and cotton — to honor its commitment to the agricultural portion, said Rabobank. “To facilitate the high procurement, most of the existing retaliatory tariffs are expected to be removed soon,” it said. That adds to the growing belief that the tariffs, which became the catalyst to the trade war and which remain even after the signing of the phase one, could drown the deal unless the two sides have the will to move on.

** After markets closed Friday, reports emerged Saturday that Libya’s National Oil Corp has declared force majeure on oil exports from five ports — Brega, Zueitina, Ras Lanuf, Hariga and Sidra — under the control of renegade general Khalifa Hafta. A military strongman trying to seize political power in Libya, Haftar, halted oil shipments from the to gain leverage ahead of peace talks in Berlin on Sunday. Analysts estimated that least 800,000 barrels per day of crude supplies out of Libya had been disrupted. The oil-rich North African state had steadily pumped 1.3 million bpd before that.

Investing.com’s estimate is that Brent could trade at a premium of up to $2 per barrel or more when Asian and European markets reopen Monday, while U.S. markets remained closed for the Martin Luther King holiday.

Energy Calendar Ahead

Monday, Jan 20

Genscape Cushing crude stockpile estimates (private data)

Wednesday, Jan 22

American Petroleum Institute weekly report on oil stockpiles.

Thursday, Jan 23

EIA weekly report on oil stockpiles

EIA weekly natural gas report

Friday, Jan 24

Baker Hughes weekly rig count.

Precious Metals Review

It seems difficult to keep gold more than a day with speculation going back and forth of the potential success of the U.S.-China deal. More interestingly, it’s virtually impossible to push down palladium, which hit record highs again Friday on supply concerns.

Gold futures for February delivery on New York’s COMEX settled up $3.10, or 0.6%, at $1,560.30 per ounce. For the week, it was flat.

Spot gold, which tracks live trades in bullion, was up $7.91, or 0.5%, at $1,560.45. For the week, it was down 0.3%.

Gold prices had initially fallen after China agreed to purchase at least $200 billion worth of US goods over the next two years under the Phase One deal signed on Wednesday.

But as the days progressed, analysts have questioned the potential success of the deal, and the chances of the trade war recurring with both nations keeping much of the tariffs they had imposed on each other prior to the agreement.

“Following a noteworthy positioning squeeze, the yellow metal is creeping higher once again,” TD Securities said in a note. “Along with positive expectations for growth comes the potential for inflation to creep higher, and without a commensurate Fed response, this would translate into lower real rates.”

The Federal Reserve cut rates by a quarter percent point for three months back-to-back in 2019, before bringing that easing cycle to a halt in December. With U.S. economic data mostly upbeat now, analysts do not expect the central bank to embark on a new round of cuts unless the trade war recurs.

Spot palladium jumped a whopping $177, or 7.7%, to $2,490 per ounce. On Friday, it hit an all-time high of $2,539.31 and closed the week up 17%.

Palladium futures were up up $77.45, or 3.6%, at $2,255.25, after touching a record high of $2,298.35. It rose 8.5% for the week.

Palladium was the best-performing commodity in 2019, gaining 55%. It is already up 28% year-to-date.

Investing.com - It finally got done. And we’re back to arguing what good it can do, now that it’s done.

I’m talking, of course, about the $200 billion U.S.-China deal signed at the White House this week, the so-called phase one agreement that will attempt to end the mother-of-all trade wars - even as there are calls for a phase two to start from where the phase one will end.

The two-year long interim deal - which, interestingly, is proportionate to the duration of the trade war between the Trump and Xi governments - has been turned inside out since it was inked Wednesday. And the first holes have been poked by reviewers at China’s commitment to buy $52 billion of U.S. crude oil and other energy products. Negative speculation over the deal was enough to send West Texas Intermediate, the benchmark for U.S. crude, down almost 1% on the week as it settled Friday at $58.54 per barrel. Brent, the global benchmark for crude, rose a modest 0.2% to settle at $64.85.

Further weighing on crude prices Friday was the weekly oil rig count published by industry firm Baker Hughes, which showed drillers adding 14 rigs to bring to 673 the total number across U.S. oil fields. A higher rig count, in the simplest sense, means higher crude production. Over the past two weeks, the rig count had fallen, extending last year’s drop of 208.

On the precious metals front, gold, benefited from the negative media swirl over the phase one as the safe-haven continued to seek a hedge to potential troubles in the deal. But more than gold, it was palladium that rocked precious metals this week as the auto-catalyst shot to a new all-time high above $2,500 an ounce - up 28% within just two weeks after a 55% gain throughout 2019. More in the precious metals review section below.

Energy Review

From the energy aspect of the phase one alone, there were as many arguments on whether the audacious demands made by Trump on China were plausible, as there were concerns about the impact that Beijing’s assumed compliance will have on global commerce.

With both sides retaining much of the tariffs imposed on each other over the past two years - Trump for leverage against Beijing and Xi to ensure no loss of “face” for the Chinese - analysts were unsure of how the step-up in trade could occur.

“The consensus expectation is that if the deal is respected, China’s crude oil imports from the US will rise to at least 500,000 barrels per day from zero in last October,” said Olivier Jakob, founder of Petromatrix, an oil risk consultancy in Zug, Switzerland. “However, at this stage, it is difficult to see how China would do this with its current import tariffs; something must change there,” Jakob added.

He also said that if China were to increase its U.S. energy consumption to fulfill the deal, the United States would account for almost all of Chinese oil import growth in the next 12 months, “to the detriment of OPEC+ and the North Sea”. OPEC+ groups the Saudi-led Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries with non-OPEC members like Russia. The North Sea is the production hub for Brent.

Jakob’s perspective was shared by Refinitiv oil columnist Clyde Russell, who went a step further in questioning the impact that such Chinese compliance would have on the global oil trade.

“The problem for energy markets isn't whether China can actually buy the amount of crude oil, coal and liquefied natural gas it has apparently committed to under the trade truce with the United States,” Russell wrote in a Jan. 16 commentary. “The real issue is what happens if Beijing tries and succeeds?”

Russell explained that as part of the agreement, China agreed to buy at least $52.4 billion in additional energy purchases over the next two years, from a baseline of $9.1 billion in 2017. That will be broken into $18.5 billion in 2020 and $33.9 billion in 2021.

The best-ever month for China's imports from the United States was June 2018, when 14 million barrels arrived, according to Refinitiv data.

If that record performance is annualized, Russell said it would mean that China would buy about 170 million barrels, worth some $9.82 billion based on the Jan. 16 price of $57.81 for a barrel for WTI.

“For China to reach the 2020 target of $27.6 billion in energy imports from the United States, it would take more than a doubling of the record months achieved in the past,” Russell noted. “It also remains to be seen how China's existing suppliers would react to losing market share in the world's top crude importer: Would they simply roll over, or, more likely, try to protect their market share while going after U.S. customers outside of China?”

China’s biggest oil suppliers have historically been from the Middle East, led by Saudi Arabia, which is the third largest crude producer after the United States and Russia.

Energy aside, there were also questions about the agricultural portion of the deal, worth $32 billion. Netherlands-based Rabobank estimated that Chinese imports of U.S. soybeans and corn — often the only farm products talked about by the media during the trade war — would account for just about half or more of the deal.

China would have to buy a lot more of food and farm products -- including meat, seafood, dairy and cotton — to honor its commitment to the agricultural portion, said Rabobank. “To facilitate the high procurement, most of the existing retaliatory tariffs are expected to be removed soon,” it said. That adds to the growing belief that the tariffs, which became the catalyst to the trade war and which remain even after the signing of the phase one, could drown the deal unless the two sides have the will to move on.

** After markets closed Friday, reports emerged Saturday that Libya’s National Oil Corp has declared force majeure on oil exports from five ports — Brega, Zueitina, Ras Lanuf, Hariga and Sidra — under the control of renegade general Khalifa Hafta. A military strongman trying to seize political power in Libya, Haftar, halted oil shipments from the to gain leverage ahead of peace talks in Berlin on Sunday. Analysts estimated that least 800,000 barrels per day of crude supplies out of Libya had been disrupted. The oil-rich North African state had steadily pumped 1.3 million bpd before that.

Investing.com’s estimate is that Brent could trade at a premium of up to $2 per barrel or more when Asian and European markets reopen Monday, while U.S. markets remained closed for the Martin Luther King holiday.

Energy Calendar Ahead

Monday, Jan 20

Genscape Cushing crude stockpile estimates (private data)

Wednesday, Jan 22

American Petroleum Institute weekly report on oil stockpiles.

Thursday, Jan 23

EIA weekly report on oil stockpiles

EIA weekly natural gas report

Friday, Jan 24

Baker Hughes weekly rig count.

Precious Metals Review

It seems difficult to keep gold more than a day with speculation going back and forth of the potential success of the U.S.-China deal. More interestingly, it’s virtually impossible to push down palladium, which hit record highs again Friday on supply concerns.

Gold futures for February delivery on New York’s COMEX settled up $3.10, or 0.6%, at $1,560.30 per ounce. For the week, it was flat.

Spot gold, which tracks live trades in bullion, was up $7.91, or 0.5%, at $1,560.45. For the week, it was down 0.3%.

Gold prices had initially fallen after China agreed to purchase at least $200 billion worth of US goods over the next two years under the Phase One deal signed on Wednesday.

But as the days progressed, analysts have questioned the potential success of the deal, and the chances of the trade war recurring with both nations keeping much of the tariffs they had imposed on each other prior to the agreement.

“Following a noteworthy positioning squeeze, the yellow metal is creeping higher once again,” TD Securities said in a note. “Along with positive expectations for growth comes the potential for inflation to creep higher, and without a commensurate Fed response, this would translate into lower real rates.”

The Federal Reserve cut rates by a quarter percent point for three months back-to-back in 2019, before bringing that easing cycle to a halt in December. With U.S. economic data mostly upbeat now, analysts do not expect the central bank to embark on a new round of cuts unless the trade war recurs.

Spot palladium jumped a whopping $177, or 7.7%, to $2,490 per ounce. On Friday, it hit an all-time high of $2,539.31 and closed the week up 17%.

Palladium futures were up up $77.45, or 3.6%, at $2,255.25, after touching a record high of $2,298.35. It rose 8.5% for the week.

Palladium was the best-performing commodity in 2019, gaining 55%. It is already up 28% year-to-date.

By Barani Krishnan

Investing.com - It finally got done. And we’re back to arguing what good it can do, now that it’s done.

I’m talking, of course, about the $200 billion U.S.-China deal signed at the White House this week, the so-called phase one agreement that will attempt to end the mother-of-all trade wars - even as there are calls for a phase two to start from where the phase one will end.

The two-year long interim deal - which, interestingly, is proportionate to the duration of the trade war between the Trump and Xi governments - has been turned inside out since it was inked Wednesday. And the first holes have been poked by reviewers at China’s commitment to buy $52 billion of U.S. crude oil and other energy products. Negative speculation over the deal was enough to send West Texas Intermediate, the benchmark for U.S. crude, down almost 1% on the week as it settled Friday at $58.54 per barrel. Brent, the global benchmark for crude, rose a modest 0.2% to settle at $64.85.

Further weighing on crude prices Friday was the weekly oil rig count published by industry firm Baker Hughes, which showed drillers adding 14 rigs to bring to 673 the total number across U.S. oil fields. A higher rig count, in the simplest sense, means higher crude production. Over the past two weeks, the rig count had fallen, extending last year’s drop of 208.

On the precious metals front, gold, benefited from the negative media swirl over the phase one as the safe-haven continued to seek a hedge to potential troubles in the deal. But more than gold, it was palladium that rocked precious metals this week as the auto-catalyst shot to a new all-time high above $2,500 an ounce - up 28% within just two weeks after a 55% gain throughout 2019. More in the precious metals review section below.

Energy Review

From the energy aspect of the phase one alone, there were as many arguments on whether the audacious demands made by Trump on China were plausible, as there were concerns about the impact that Beijing’s assumed compliance will have on global commerce.

With both sides retaining much of the tariffs imposed on each other over the past two years - Trump for leverage against Beijing and Xi to ensure no loss of “face” for the Chinese - analysts were unsure of how the step-up in trade could occur.

“The consensus expectation is that if the deal is respected, China’s crude oil imports from the US will rise to at least 500,000 barrels per day from zero in last October,” said Olivier Jakob, founder of Petromatrix, an oil risk consultancy in Zug, Switzerland. “However, at this stage, it is difficult to see how China would do this with its current import tariffs; something must change there,” Jakob added.

He also said that if China were to increase its U.S. energy consumption to fulfill the deal, the United States would account for almost all of Chinese oil import growth in the next 12 months, “to the detriment of OPEC+ and the North Sea”. OPEC+ groups the Saudi-led Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries with non-OPEC members like Russia. The North Sea is the production hub for Brent.

Jakob’s perspective was shared by Refinitiv oil columnist Clyde Russell, who went a step further in questioning the impact that such Chinese compliance would have on the global oil trade.

“The problem for energy markets isn't whether China can actually buy the amount of crude oil, coal and liquefied natural gas it has apparently committed to under the trade truce with the United States,” Russell wrote in a Jan. 16 commentary. “The real issue is what happens if Beijing tries and succeeds?”

Russell explained that as part of the agreement, China agreed to buy at least $52.4 billion in additional energy purchases over the next two years, from a baseline of $9.1 billion in 2017. That will be broken into $18.5 billion in 2020 and $33.9 billion in 2021.

The best-ever month for China's imports from the United States was June 2018, when 14 million barrels arrived, according to Refinitiv data.

If that record performance is annualized, Russell said it would mean that China would buy about 170 million barrels, worth some $9.82 billion based on the Jan. 16 price of $57.81 for a barrel for WTI.

“For China to reach the 2020 target of $27.6 billion in energy imports from the United States, it would take more than a doubling of the record months achieved in the past,” Russell noted. “It also remains to be seen how China's existing suppliers would react to losing market share in the world's top crude importer: Would they simply roll over, or, more likely, try to protect their market share while going after U.S. customers outside of China?”

China’s biggest oil suppliers have historically been from the Middle East, led by Saudi Arabia, which is the third largest crude producer after the United States and Russia.

Energy aside, there were also questions about the agricultural portion of the deal, worth $32 billion. Netherlands-based Rabobank estimated that Chinese imports of U.S. soybeans and corn — often the only farm products talked about by the media during the trade war — would account for just about half or more of the deal.

China would have to buy a lot more of food and farm products -- including meat, seafood, dairy and cotton — to honor its commitment to the agricultural portion, said Rabobank. “To facilitate the high procurement, most of the existing retaliatory tariffs are expected to be removed soon,” it said. That adds to the growing belief that the tariffs, which became the catalyst to the trade war and which remain even after the signing of the phase one, could drown the deal unless the two sides have the will to move on.

** After markets closed Friday, reports emerged Saturday that Libya’s National Oil Corp has declared force majeure on oil exports from five ports — Brega, Zueitina, Ras Lanuf, Hariga and Sidra — under the control of renegade general Khalifa Hafta. A military strongman trying to seize political power in Libya, Haftar, halted oil shipments from the to gain leverage ahead of peace talks in Berlin on Sunday. Analysts estimated that least 800,000 barrels per day of crude supplies out of Libya had been disrupted. The oil-rich North African state had steadily pumped 1.3 million bpd before that.

Investing.com’s estimate is that Brent could trade at a premium of up to $2 per barrel or more when Asian and European markets reopen Monday, while U.S. markets remained closed for the Martin Luther King holiday.

Energy Calendar Ahead

Monday, Jan 20

Genscape Cushing crude stockpile estimates (private data)

Wednesday, Jan 22

American Petroleum Institute weekly report on oil stockpiles.

Thursday, Jan 23

EIA weekly report on oil stockpiles

EIA weekly natural gas report

Friday, Jan 24

Baker Hughes weekly rig count.

Precious Metals Review

It seems difficult to keep gold more than a day with speculation going back and forth of the potential success of the U.S.-China deal. More interestingly, it’s virtually impossible to push down palladium, which hit record highs again Friday on supply concerns.

Gold futures for February delivery on New York’s COMEX settled up $3.10, or 0.6%, at $1,560.30 per ounce. For the week, it was flat.

Spot gold, which tracks live trades in bullion, was up $7.91, or 0.5%, at $1,560.45. For the week, it was down 0.3%.

Gold prices had initially fallen after China agreed to purchase at least $200 billion worth of US goods over the next two years under the Phase One deal signed on Wednesday.

But as the days progressed, analysts have questioned the potential success of the deal, and the chances of the trade war recurring with both nations keeping much of the tariffs they had imposed on each other prior to the agreement.

“Following a noteworthy positioning squeeze, the yellow metal is creeping higher once again,” TD Securities said in a note. “Along with positive expectations for growth comes the potential for inflation to creep higher, and without a commensurate Fed response, this would translate into lower real rates.”

The Federal Reserve cut rates by a quarter percent point for three months back-to-back in 2019, before bringing that easing cycle to a halt in December. With U.S. economic data mostly upbeat now, analysts do not expect the central bank to embark on a new round of cuts unless the trade war recurs.

Spot palladium jumped a whopping $177, or 7.7%, to $2,490 per ounce. On Friday, it hit an all-time high of $2,539.31 and closed the week up 17%.

Palladium futures were up up $77.45, or 3.6%, at $2,255.25, after touching a record high of $2,298.35. It rose 8.5% for the week.

Palladium was the best-performing commodity in 2019, gaining 55%. It is already up 28% year-to-date.

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.