Sterling and UK-tied stocks extend gains; Brexit deal faces another tough test in Parliament
The UK-focused FTSE 250 index has accelerated to a gain of more than 1% to join sterling’s surge by a similar rate on the day after the EU and the UK confirmed a Brexit deal has been reached
The retailers, housebuilders, business services and property firms that depend on the UK for most of their revenues are extending gains made in recent weeks when hopes began to rise. FTSE 100 banks with large deposit bases in Britain, Lloyds (LON:LLOY), RBS (LON:RBS) and Barclays (LON:BARC) rise to near the top of the FTSE 100 along with British Land – the commercial property giant that could see outsize benefits from completions after years of uncertainty put many deals on hold. Insurer Prudential (LON:PRU) and homebuilder Persimmon (LON:PSN) were among top risers too a short while ago for similar reasons.
As for the pound, sterling continues its own surge whilst traders remain on high alert with volatility indicators continuing to flash warnings that some of the biggest whipsaws for years could be seen at any time.
In other words, whatever is heard over the next 24 hours and beyond, unless such hedging and speculative markets calm down, that’s a sure enough sign that Brexit mayhem isn’t over, in the markets and beyond.
The key fault line now appears to be that the DUP continues to insist that regardless of EU-UK agreement, its stance on Prime Minister’s Boris Johnson’s plans on customs, sales tax and voting consent have not changed. In short, the Northern Ireland unionist party that the government needs on board to give the deal its best chances of being passed in Parliament is signalling that, at worst, it might not support the deal.
It’s one reason market attention will now shift to focus to the strength of support among Labour and Conservative Brexit-supporting MPs.
All told, the chances that the deal can be passed by the House, in a rare Saturday sitting, may not be worse than seen over the past year, but the odds are still not great.
Meanwhile, sterling remains the best, if not the only market-based Brexit barometer, and its elevation that holds 5.6% above prices at the start of the month speak volumes. In similar fashion to the fundamental focus, the technical emphasis has moved away from the ‘conviction resistance’ of $1.2783, the rule-of-thumb price that demonstrated buyers were convinced that the deal could at least get over the line in Brussels. It oughtn’t to have been a demanding bar to leap, though it proved to be; which in itself is an ambivalent indication for current momentum. Given that it was an intermediate high relative to the year’s peaks, it ought to have been a minimum technical condition. The 61.8% Fibonacci retracement marker of pound's March-September fall should be more important, and by extension, more difficult to cross. Indeed, GBP/USD has tested and, so far, failed on a closing basis to breach $1.2838 resistance associated with the Fib. Whilst the rate has on Thursday spiked to just short of $1.30—a level with psychological weight beyond markets—it is unlikely to establish itself above that price without besting key technical markers first. And remember, all of the above are but staging posts to the real prizes—including May’s $1.317 peak and the year’s $1.33 highs.
GBP/USD – Daily
"Disclaimer: The information and opinions in this report are for general information use only and are not intended as an offer or solicitation with respect to the purchase or sale of any currency or CFD contract. All opinions and information contained in this report are subject to change without notice. This report has been prepared without regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation and needs of any particular recipient.
Any references to historical price movements or levels is informational based on our analysis and we do not represent or warrant that any such movements or levels are likely to reoccur in the future. While the information contained herein was obtained from sources believed to be reliable, the author does not guarantee its accuracy or completeness, nor does the author assume any liability for any direct, indirect or consequential loss that may result from the reliance by any person upon any such information or opinions."