🎁 💸 Warren Buffett's Top Picks Are Up +49.1%. Copy Them to Your Watchlist – For FreeCopy Portfolio

Cablevision sues Verizon, alleges false WiFi advertising

Published 30/01/2015, 00:27
© Reuters. A cybersecurity expert monitors telecommunications traffic at a network operations center in a Verizon facility in Ashburn, Virginia
VZ
-
CVC
-

By Jonathan Stempel and Malathi Nayak

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Cablevision Systems Corp on Thursday sued Verizon Communications Inc, accusing it of falsely advertising to consumers on television, radio and the Internet that its WiFi service is the fastest available.

The complaint, filed with the U.S. District Court in Central Islip, New York, accuses Verizon of basing its "fastest WiFi available" claim on new network routers it has been installing for up to $199.99, despite knowing that Cablevision offers the same routers for its Optimum network, free of charge.

Cablevision also called the advertising an effort to stymie its launch of a low-cost "Freewheel" phone that could cut into sales by Verizon and other cellular service providers.

"Verizon's claim that it has faster WiFi than Cablevision is false, deceptive and designed to mislead consumers," Bethpage, New York-based Cablevision said in a statement.

It seeks to force New York-based Verizon, the largest U.S. wireless company, to stop and correct its alleged false advertising, and to pay damages.

Verizon rejected Cablevision's allegations.

"This is a boldface ploy to promote Cablevision's latest wireless gambit," Verizon said in a statement. "A third party has tested and validated the FiOS Quantum Gateway router. It offers the fastest in-home Wi-Fi available from any provider."

In 2011, Cablevision had sued Verizon for allegedly misleading consumers in an advertising campaign about the speed of Cablevision's Internet services. The companies later settled.

© Reuters. A cybersecurity expert monitors telecommunications traffic at a network operations center in a Verizon facility in Ashburn, Virginia

The case is Cablevision Systems Corp et al v. Verizon Communications Inc et al, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of New York, No. 15-00456.

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.