NVDA gained a massive 197% since our AI first added it in November - is it time to sell? 🤔Read more

UK watchdog fines GSK $54 million over 'pay-for-delay' drug deals

Published 12/02/2016, 09:54
© Reuters. A British Airways airplane flies past a signage for pharmaceutical giant GlaxoSmithKlein in London
MRCG
-
GSK
-
VTRS
-

By Ben Hirschler

LONDON (Reuters) - Britain's competition watchdog has fined GlaxoSmithKline  (L:GSK) 37.6 million pounds ($54.4 million) for market abuse in striking deals to delay the launch of cheap generic copies of its former blockbuster antidepressant Seroxat.

Generic drug companies involved, including Germany's Merck KGaA (DE:MRCG), were also fined smaller amounts, the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) said on Friday, bringing the total penalties to 45 million pounds.

GSK said it disagreed with the decision and was considering grounds for appeal.

The CMA move is the latest example of regulators trying to curb "pay-for-delay" deals by drug companies and follows previous actions by U.S. and European antitrust authorities. The watchdog first accused GSK of anti-competitive behaviour over Seroxat in April 2013, but it has only now handed out fines.

"Today’s decision sends out a strong message that we will tackle illegal behaviour that is designed to stifle competition at the expense of customers," CMA enforcement head Michael Grenfell said in a statement.

The case relates to agreements struck more than a decade ago. Since then the patents protecting paroxetine, the active ingredient in Seroxat, have expired and the arrangements under investigation have been terminated.

Between 2001 and 2004, the CMA said GSK paid generic drug companies over 50 million pounds with the intention of delaying the potential entry of independent competitors, thereby depriving the National Health Service (NHS) of cheaper supplies.

When independent generic copies eventually arrived at the end of 2003, average paroxetine prices dropped by more than 70 percent in two years.

GSK said it struck the deals in order to settle costly, complex and uncertain patent disputes and its action had actually brought down the cost of medicine for the state-run health service by allowing some generic competition.

"The agreements allowed the generics companies to enter the market early with a paroxetine product and ultimately enabled a saving of over 15 million pounds to the NHS," the company said.

Among the generic companies involved in the case, the CMA said it had fined Merck KGaA 5.8 million pounds, as the former parent of Generics UK (GUK), while a 1.5 million pounds penalty was imposed for infringements by Alpharma.

Merck, which sold GUK to Mylan (O:MYL) in 2007, said it had not been directly involved, adding it had made adequate provision for the fine, which would have no material impact on its financial results.

© Reuters. A British Airways airplane flies past a signage for pharmaceutical giant GlaxoSmithKlein in London

The issue of brand-name pharmaceutical companies paying makers of generic drugs to drop patent challenges was at the centre of a European review of the sector in 2008-2009, which did not result in any action against GSK.

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.