Get 40% Off
💰 Buffett reveals a $6.7B stake in Chubb. Copy the full portfolio for FREE with InvestingPro’s Stock Ideas toolCopy Portfolio

Royal Mail: Three day work weeks faces government pushback

Published 24/01/2024, 11:55
Royal Mail: Three day work weeks faces government pushback
IDSI
-

Proactive Investors - Ofcom said the Royal Mail (LON:IDSI) could reduce letter delivery days in the service from six to five or even three, in proposals aimed at modernising the postal service.

Two primary options for the service were laid out:

  • Making changes to existing First and Second Class and business products so that most letters are delivered within three days or longer, with a next-day service still available for any urgent letters.
  • Reducing the number of letter delivery days in the service from six to five or three.

For the second option to be passed it would require Parliament to vote in favour of changing primary legislation.

Downgrading delivery targets is not an option for reform, Ofcom stated.

Its estimated Royal Mail could achieve a net cost saving of £100-£200 million if letter deliveries were reduced to five days; and £400-£650 million if reduced to three days, the watchdog said.

If most letters were delivered within three days, it could achieve net cost savings of £150-£650 million, Ofcom added.

“Under any scenario, Royal Mail must modernise its network, become more efficient and improve its service levels,” the report revealed.

Reaction

Shares in IDS, the owner of Royal Mail, are up 5.35% but analysts remain sceptical that changes to delivery days will get through Parliament.

Postal Affairs Minister Kevin Hollinrake said the Government was committed to a six-day service from the Royal Mail.

Hollinrake told Times Radio: “The Prime Minister [has] been very clear on this, six-day delivery is really important for many people in this country, many of our citizens, but also for many of our businesses.”

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

He was even clearer on the BBC, describing the 6-day service as “sacrosanct.”

Liberum’s Gerald Khoo suggested the political incentives for approving changes are asymmetric and “skewed entirely to the downside.”

“The government has rebuffed previous requests to reduce deliveries to five days per week, and we see no upside to any government to approving changes until the status quo is imminently untenable,” he said.

Peel Hunt (LON:PEEL) noted the plans would require parliamentary approval, “and unhelpfully, Downing Street indicated it would not support them.”

On Monday, a spokesperson for the Prime Minister said, “he would not countenance seeing Saturday deliveries scrapped.”

Changes in Europe

Similar proposals have been made for other national services like Germany’s Deutsche Post (ETR:DHLn), owned by DHL.

Germany’s Federal Ministry of Economics suggested increasing letter delivery targets from one day to three days, while also hinting at the use of machines to meet these obligations.

In August, the German federal network regulator rejected the postal services plea for a stamp price cap to be lifted in the hope of reducing some of the rising costs.

In France, La Poste has been criticised for abolishing its first-class mail service, which offered next-day delivery.

Under the state-owned post office’s former rules, letters could be delivered within a day, three working days or within four days, with different priced stamps for each service.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

Now, letters can only be sent within three working days.

To deal with emergency letters, the La Poste offers a service where people can write their message out on its website, where it will be printed out at a post office before being put in an envelope and delivered.

French nationals expressed dismay at the decision, with news magazine L’Obs calling the scheme “within a whisker of reinventing the fax machine”.

Why the review?

Concerns about the universal postal service becoming unsustainable have been at the forefront of both the Royal Mail and the regulator's minds.

Both claim the services are at risk because it is failing to evolve to current trends of people sending more parcels and fewer letters.

Officials would have to cast their minds back more than a decade to 2011, when changes were last implemented to the service.

During this time, letter volumes have halved.

Royal Mail reported half-year losses of nearly £320 million in the first half of the 2024 financial year.

Boss Martin Seidenberg has called for changes to the universal service agreements or risk turbulence at the postal group.

In a letter to Liam Byrne, the chair of the business and trade select committee, he said: “Delivering the current universal service requirements – in a financially sustainable way – is increasingly difficult, if not impossible, to achieve as the mix and number of parcels and letters changes.

“It is simply not sustainable to maintain a delivery network that was built for 20bn letters when we are now delivering only 7bn.”

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

Read more on Proactive Investors UK

Disclaimer

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.