Black Friday is Now! Don’t miss out on up to 60% OFF InvestingProCLAIM SALE

UK sold Royal Mail too cheaply, but not by much - official report

Published 18/12/2014, 07:59
© Reuters. A Royal Mail postal van is parked outside homes in Maybury near Woking in southern England
IDSI
-

LONDON (Reuters) - Shares in Britain's Royal Mail postal service should have been sold at a higher price when the firm was privatised last year, but the lost revenue was lower than previous estimates, a government-commissioned report said on Thursday.

Lord Myners, a former Labour minister commissioned to see if the government could improve the way it sells public assets, said on Thursday that Royal Mail could have raised up to 180 million pounds more for the public purse.

The high profile public offering of a 60 percent stake in Royal Mail was trumpeted as a success by the Conservative-Liberal Democrat coalition, but it has drawn fierce criticism from the opposition Labour party and trade unions.

Critics argue the sale, which raised 2 billion pounds, was rushed and point to a sharp rise in the share price after the sale as evidence of a botched deal. Business Secretary Vince Cable had insisted it would take time for a true share price to emerge.

Myners said his panel believed the offer could have been increased by 20 to 30 pence per share, equivalent to an additional 120 million pounds to 180 million pounds for the government.

"For the avoidance of doubt, we do not believe that a price anywhere near the levels seen in the aftermarket could have been achieved at listing," the report said.

Royal Mail shares were issued at 330 pence in October 2013, and subsequently rose to reach almost double that level at 618 pence in January. The shares have since fallen back and are trading just under 400p.

A previous report on the sale by the public spending watchdog in April said the government had been too cautious in pricing the deal, leading to missed revenue of at least 750 million pounds.

© Reuters. A Royal Mail postal van is parked outside homes in Maybury near Woking in southern England

Myners said in future the government should consider revising the book building process, in which large institutional investors express demand for the shares.

(Reporting by William James; editing by David Clarke)

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.