Black Friday is Now! Don’t miss out on up to 60% OFF InvestingProCLAIM SALE

Ex-Lehman trader loses bid for $83 million 'windfall' bonus - judge

Published 07/07/2016, 00:23
Updated 07/07/2016, 00:30
© Reuters. A Christie's employee poses for a photograph with the plaque from Lehman Brothers' European headquarters at Christie's in central London
BARC
-

By Jonathan Stempel

NEW YORK (Reuters) - A federal judge on Wednesday said a former star Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc trader was not entitled to an $83 million (£64.4 million) bonus he claimed he was owed following the investment bank's 2008 collapse, on top of a similar sum that Barclays Plc (L:BARC) already paid him.

U.S. District Judge Lorna Schofield in Manhattan also said the former trader Jonathan Hoffman did not deserve $7.7 million that a federal bankruptcy judge had said he could recoup from the estate of Lehman's brokerage unit, Lehman Brothers Inc, based on an unpaid instalment from his 2007 bonus.

Hoffman's quest for additional pay is one of the largest lawsuits left in the wind-down of Lehman, whose Sept. 15, 2008 bankruptcy remains the biggest in U.S. history and helped trigger a global financial crisis.

Schofield said Hoffman, a former managing director, had been "extremely successful" trading interest rate products, generating billions of dollars of profit since joining Lehman in 1994.

But she said it "strains credulity" for Hoffman to argue that Barclays, the British bank that bought much of Lehman's North American banking business, paid him $83 million as a signing bonus or motivational tool, and that the sum only coincidentally matched what Lehman owed.

"He negotiated for and received everything he was owed, and now seeks to collect an $83 million windfall," Schofield wrote. "His claim is barred in its entirety."

Lawyers for Hoffman did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

A spokesman for James Giddens, a court-appointed trustee liquidating the Lehman brokerage estate, said the decision ensures that there will be no "double recoveries," an outcome that is fair to customers and creditors.

Hoffman had sought a payment equal to roughly one-seventh of the $540 million of profit he claimed to generate for Lehman in its 2008 fiscal year, prior to the firm's failure.

The judge said that payment obligation, however, had moved to Barclays.

Schofield's denial of the $7.7 million payment reversed part of an Oct. 2015 ruling in which U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Shelley Chapman in Manhattan also rejected an $83 million payout.

© Reuters. A Christie's employee poses for a photograph with the plaque from Lehman Brothers' European headquarters at Christie's in central London

The case is In re: Lehman Brothers Inc, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 15-08903.

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.