High St. highs and lows
Cyclical by nature, challenging UK retail trends can be sticky, and their pressures uneven. Take Dixons Carphone (LON:DC). Among large high-street names, it has borne the brunt of a double whammy from weak wage growth and volatile inflation. Shares of Britain’s largest electronics and electricals vendor have fallen hard since Britain voted to leave the EU, when uncertainty began to cloud domestic industries, compounded by an unanchored sterling.
With Dixons already down about 55% in 2017, this week’s updated CPI and earnings—still elevated and slack respectively—only trimmed the stock a bit. Other retailers at the discretionary end of the high street are more in focus. Earlier in the week, JD Sports (LON:JD) showed it’s not impossible to beat the street by carving out a discretionary niche. But the 34% rise of its stock over a year is unusual for a retailer of its size. Dunelm Group (LON:DNLM) is among a clutch of less sure-footed groups with low exposure to necessities—which in theory can underpin revenues. The family-run firm has grown at a fair clip since joining the FTSE 250 seven years ago, and now has a market capitalisation of £1.2bn. That’s more than double that of Debenhams (LON:DEB), though a fifth the value of homeware rival Marks & Spencer (LON:MKS), and six times smaller than Kingfisher (LON:KGF).
Still challenged
Dunelm’s place at the intersection of markets dominated by longer-established names hasn’t always been comfortable. Its shares are 16% lower this year, though they’ve halved a deeper loss on signs that a string of mishaps has passed. The rebound continued on Wednesday with full-year sales coming in on target at £955m, though 23% lower year-on-year. Dunelm still expects “the trading climate to remain challenging”, noting disposable incomes are pressured.
In other words, despite improved recent trading, it’s too early to say it has manoeuvred sustainably out of a tough spot. Dunelm’s goal of doubling sales over the ‘medium term’ may not necessarily apply to its current fiscal year. Dunelm could therefore still close a roughly ten percentage point gap to a rival on the downside—long-term turnaround play Debenhams—before catching up with a rival on the upside—possible near-term comeback story M&S. Either way, uncertainty remains a negative denominator for Dunelm.
Next’s digital revamp
The other pair-off with M&S in focus this week is Next (LON:NXT). The UK institution is Next’s closest rival in the mid-priced clothing market. Like Dunelm, Next, which sells more clothes to Britons than any other company, is showing signs of recovery. Again, like Dunelm though, recovery hopes are tentative and may already be in its share price. “I’m marginally less pessimistic than I was three months ago” CEO Simon Wolfson said in August.
The patch helping him avoid the blues was probably a startling 11.4% rise in digital sales following a wide-ranging online revamp. Digital sales will be in focus when Next releases first-half results on Thursday. Continued strong online growth will help decide if the stock closes the 2 percentage point gap to M&S over the year-to-date, after a 16% rise since July. Even after that bounce, its shares are down 9% this year. Any signs that new pockets of growth are evaporating could weigh on the stock again, and read poorly across the high street as well.
Disclaimer: The information and opinions in this report are for general information use only and are not intended as an offer or solicitation with respect to the purchase or sale of any currency or CFD contract. All opinions and information contained in this report are subject to change without notice. This report has been prepared without regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation and needs of any particular recipient. Any references to historical price movements or levels is informational based on our analysis and we do not represent or warrant that any such movements or levels are likely to reoccur in the future. While the information contained herein was obtained from sources believed to be reliable, the author does not guarantee its accuracy or completeness, nor does the author assume any liability for any direct, indirect or consequential loss that may result from the reliance by any person upon any such information or opinions.