Get 40% Off
⚠ Earnings Alert! Which stocks are poised to surge?
See the stocks on our ProPicks radar. These strategies gained 19.7% year-to-date.
Unlock full list

Court win for EU regulators over crackdown on $825 million Belgium tax scheme

Published 16/09/2021, 08:52
Updated 16/09/2021, 11:56
© Reuters. European Union flags flutter outside the EU Commission headquarters in Brussels, Belgium May 5, 2021. REUTERS/Yves Herman

By Foo Yun Chee and Marine Strauss

LUXEMBOURG (Reuters) -EU competition regulators secured a big win on Thursday when Europe's top court backed their crackdown on Belgium's 700-million-euro ($825-million) tax scheme for Magnetrol, BP (LON:BP) and more than 30 other multinationals.

European competition chief Margrethe Vestager launched a fight against sweetheart tax deals nearly a decade ago. She has won three cases at a lower tribunal but lost two, including an order to iPhone maker Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL) to pay 13 billion euros ($15.3 billion) in Irish back taxes which was dismissed by the tribunal last year.

The European Union executive, the European Commission, ordered Belgium in 2016 to recover some 700 million euros from companies which benefited from the scheme. These included U.S. manufacturer Magnetrol, oil company BP, chemical producer BASF, Wabco, Cellio, Atlas Copco and Belgacom, now Proximus.

The EU competition watchdog said the series of tax rulings given to the companies constituted an aid scheme.

The EU Court of Justice (CJEU) agreed with the Commission's arguments, saying the General Court, which in 2019 annulled the Commission's decision, had made several legal errors.

"The Commission correctly found that there was an aid scheme," judges said.

They said the regulator's sample of 22 tax rulings from a total of 66 was enough to show a systematic approach by Belgian authorities.

The final verdict in the case will still take some time, said Koen Platteau, a partner at law firm Simmons + Simmons.

"This is not the end of the judicial review process since the case is now referred back to the General Court which will have to decide on the other arguments invoked by Belgium, including on the existence of state aid," he said.

Judges referred the case back to the lower tribunal, telling it to examine whether the scheme can be classified as state aid and whether regulators were correct to order the recovery of the aid.

Following the General Court ruling, the Commission in 2019 opened separate investigations into 39 companies which benefited from the Belgian tax rulings while also appealing the judgment.

Other ongoing EU cases include Ikea and Nike (NYSE:NKE)'s Dutch tax affairs and Luxembourg's tax treatment of Finnish company Huhtamaki.

© Reuters. European Union flags flutter outside the EU Commission headquarters in Brussels, Belgium May 5, 2021. REUTERS/Yves Herman

The case is C-337/19 P Commission v Belgium and Magnetrol International.

($1 = 0.8482 euros)

Latest comments

These companies were following Belgian rules therefore its up to the Belgian Government to stump up the cash to the EU. The companies have no case to answer.
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.