Get 40% Off
🤯 This Tech Portfolio is up 29% YTD! Join Now to Get April’s Top PicksGet The Picks – Just 99 USD

Deutsche Bank, SocGen Among Weakest in European Stress Test

Published 30/07/2021, 18:28
Updated 30/07/2021, 18:28
© Reuters

© Reuters

(Bloomberg) -- Deutsche Bank AG (NYSE:DB) and Societe Generale (OTC:SCGLY) SA emerged among the weakest of the large European lenders in a stress test that regulators will consult when vetting plans on investor payouts.

The German lender’s common equity tier 1 ratio, one of the most important measures of financial strength, fell 620 basis points to 7.4% in an adverse scenario that assumes a prolonged period of low interest rates and a steep contraction of the economy over three years. Societe Generale’s ratio dropped 562 basis points to 7.5% in the European Banking Authority’s assessment, published late Friday.

“Deutsche Bank shows its resilience in a potential economic crisis even in a harsher and unfavorable scenario,” Chief Financial Officer James von Moltke said in statement. He pointed out that the bank’s rising profits in the first half of 2021 weren’t factored into the test.

The EBA’s exam, which looked at 50 banks in the region, doesn’t have a pass or fail grade, but it guides the European Central Bank and other regulators in assessing the financial system’s capital needs, as well as the appropriateness of dividend levels and staff bonuses at the banks they supervise. The ECB announced earlier this month that economic conditions have brightened enough for it to lift the restrictions on dividends in September.

The EBA’s adverse scenario showed banks on aggregate are better prepared after the pandemic to deal with a severe economic crisis than they were three years ago. They built up a CET1 ratio of 15% at the end of last year, the highest since the tests began. The measure dropped to 10.2% in the adverse scenario, slightly better than in the last round of simulations three years ago.

“Banks have continued building up their capital base,” the EBA wrote in a release late Friday. “This was achieved despite an unprecedented decline of the EU’s GDP and the first effects of the Covid-19 pandemic in 2020.”

But the EBA also pointed to dispersion in individual banks’ performance, with lenders focused on domestic activities or with lower interest income worst hit.

For Deutsche Bank (DE:DBKGn) and SocGen, the results represented a steeper drop than in some past tests. Deutsche Bank’s CET1 ratio fell to 8.1% in the 2018 test and 7.8% in the 2016 exam. SocGen’s ratio fell to 7.6% and 7.5% in those past tests. Capital rules require banks to maintain a minimum CET1 ratio of 4.5%, plus other buffers that can be adjusted by regulators as needed.

Italy’s Banca Monte dei Paschi di Siena SpA saw its CET1 ratio slump to a negative 0.1% in the adverse scenario, the worst among the lenders sampled. The world’s oldest bank, still state-owned after a bailout, is now in talks about being acquired by UniCredit SpA, according to a statement late Thursday.

BNP Paribas (OTC:BNPQY) SA, one of the lenders hit hard by the ECB’s dividend restrictions, saw its ratio drop to 8.2%, slightly better than SocGen and Deutsche Bank. Its among ten of the biggest euro-area banks that have more than 22 billion euros ($26 billion) set aside to reward shareholders, according to calculations by Bloomberg. Banco Bilbao (NYSE:BBVA) Vizcaya Argentaria SA, ING Groep (AS:INGA) NV, Intesa Sanpaolo (OTC:ISNPY) SpA and Nordea Bank Abp (OTC:NRDBY) also have big reserves.

SocGen said in June it could potentially boost dividends when it has enough clarity on the regulatory framework and the outlook for the economy. The lender currently has a payout ratio of 50% of underlying net income including share buybacks.

Deutsche Bank has said it wants to resume paying dividends next year after Chief Executive Officer Christian Sewing suspended them in 2019 to fund an extensive restructuring. Because it didn’t pay a dividend at the time, it wasn’t affected by the ECB’s de-facto ban last year.

The ECB imposed the ban partly as a trade-off for extensive regulatory relief granted to ensure credit kept flowing to businesses hurt by the crisis. Some bank executives have criticized the decision, saying it impaired their ability to raise capital because it’s made banks less attractive for investors.

The ECB has said it will “assess the capital and distribution plans of each bank” individually, indicating that the removal of the cap doesn’t mean it will allow banks to set payout levels at will. The 2021 stress test results will factor into those talks, it said.

When the ECB lifted the dividend cap, it also renewed its call on banks to tread carefully on bonus payments as part of its effort to keep banks from making large discretionary payouts to staff or investors that would deplete their capital cushions. The supervisor earlier this rejected the compensation plans of several banks including BNP Paribas, Deutsche Bank and UniCredit, forcing them to cut their bonus pools, Bloomberg News has reported.

(Adds Deutsche Bank comment in third paragraph.)

©2021 Bloomberg L.P.

 

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.