Get 40% Off
🤯 This Tech Portfolio is up 29% YTD! Join Now to Get April’s Top PicksGet The Picks – Just 99 USD

Big Four auditors failing to learn from company collapses - UK lawmaker

Published 22/10/2019, 14:59
Updated 22/10/2019, 14:59
© Reuters. Offices of Deloitte are seen in London

© Reuters. Offices of Deloitte are seen in London

By Huw Jones

LONDON (Reuters) - Accounting firms have not shown a "learning curve" from the collapse of travel company Thomas Cook and builder Carillion, with urgent reform the only way to improve audit quality, a senior British lawmaker said on Tuesday.

Rachel Reeves, a Labour lawmaker who is chair of parliament's business committee, said the failure of Thomas Cook showed again that accountants were not proactive in "doing the right thing".

Reeves was holding a hearing with representatives of EY - formerly known as Ernst & Young - and PwC, who audited Thomas Cook in the years before it collapsed in September, triggering the repatriation of 150,000 British holidaymakers - the biggest in peace time for Britain.

Addressing the Big Four auditors, which also include Deloitte and KPMG, Reeves hit out at the slow pace of change.

"How many more cases of egregious accounting do we need before your industry opens its eyes and recognises that you are complicit in this and that you need to reform?" she said.

"We can't rely on you to do the right thing and that legislation is needed to have tougher regulation because... your industry is not willing to make the changes needed."

EY, which replaced PwC as auditor of Thomas Cook in 2016, is being investigated by its regulator, the Financial Reporting Council.

EY and PwC representatives told the hearing they stood by their audits of Thomas Cook, complying in full with rules at the time, though with full hindsight some things could have been done differently.

Conservative lawmaker Antoinette Sandbach expressed incredulity at how the auditors "blithely" agreed that Thomas Cook was a "going concern", with no recent writedown in goodwill until May this year despite profit warnings and the need for cash injections.

PwC's UK head of audit Hermione Hudson said there were considerable "challenging discussions" over the going concern issue, prompting Thomas Cook to delay its annual report.

Richard Wilson, an audit partner at EY, said EY had publicly noted "material uncertainty" on the company being a going concern. The auditor is still owed 900,000 pounds from Thomas Cook for work completed.

After the Carillion and BHS collapse, two government-backed reviews have proposed setting up a new regulator, forcing companies to hire two auditors, and requiring the Big Four to run their audit and advisory services separately to avoid treading softly on audit to win lucrative advisory business.

But Britain's business minister Andrea Leadsom said last week the government would wait until early 2020 to propose legislation after a third review into the role of audit reports back before the end of 2019.

PwC and EY officials said reform should be implemented as a package drawing on all three reviews. If legislation is proposed in early 2020, change may still take a year or two, with even the regulator sceptical of planned reforms like joint audits.

© Reuters. Offices of Deloitte are seen in London

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.