Black Friday is Now! Don’t miss out on up to 60% OFF InvestingProCLAIM SALE

Exclusive - JPMorgan to pay over $125 million to settle U.S. credit card debt probes: sources

Published 08/07/2015, 01:37
Updated 08/07/2015, 01:45
© Reuters. JP Morgan Chase & Co sign outside headquarters in New York
JPM
-

By Karen Freifeld

NEW YORK (Reuters) - JPMorgan Chase & Co (N:JPM) has agreed to pay at least $125 million (£81 million) to settle probes by U.S. state and federal authorities that the bank sought to improperly collect and sell consumer credit card debt, according to people familiar with the matter.

The settlement also includes about $50 million in restitution, the sources said.

The nation's largest bank has been accused of relying on robo-signing and other discredited methods of going after consumers for debts they may not have owed and for providing inaccurate information to debt buyers. Robo-signing refers to signing documents in mass quantities without reviewing records.

The U.S. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), 47 states and the District of Columbia are expected to announce the settlements as soon as Wednesday, the people said.

The states will split some $95 million, while the CFPB will get $30 million, the people said. JPMorgan Chase and the CFPB did not return calls for comment.

A spokesman for Iowa Attorney General Tom Miller, who has been leading a group of states in probing JPMorgan's debt sales and collection actions, declined to comment.

Mississippi and California are not expected to settle at the same time, sources said. Both have lawsuits pending against JPMorgan over debt collection practices.

California Attorney General Kamala Harris sued in 2013, claiming the bank engaged in fraudulent and unlawful debt collection practices against 100,000 California credit card borrowers over some three years.

The state claims the bank flooded state courts with questionable lawsuits, filing thousands every month, including 469 such lawsuits in one day alone.

Kristin Ford, a spokeswoman for the California attorney general, did not return calls for comment.

Mississippi Attorney General Jim Hood's lawsuit filed a similar lawsuit against JPMorgan in 2013.

The Mississippi lawsuit said employees described a "chaotic" and "disorganized" workplace marred by "rampant" mistakes, inadequate training, constantly changing policies, high turnover and unrealistic quotas.

Rachael Ring, a spokeswoman for the Mississippi attorney general, would only say the lawsuit is pending.

In September 2013, the U.S. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau ordered JPMorgan to refund $309 million to about 2 million customers for illegal credit card practices, including charging consumers for credit card monitoring services they did not receive.

The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency that month also issued a consent order against JPMorgan after identifying unsound practices in connection with the bank's sworn document and collections litigation. The order demanded changes, including to debt sales.

At the time, JPMorgan said collection issues affected less than 1 percent of customers and that it stopped filing collection lawsuits in 2011 and stopped enrolling customers in credit monitoring services in 2012.

In 2012, Iowa's Attorney General Miller helped negotiate a $26 billion settlement with the nation's largest banks over mortgage abuses, which also included robo-signing.

© Reuters. JP Morgan Chase & Co sign outside headquarters in New York

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.